Unable to load image

Only one of SA Navy’s four frigates operational; no submarines serviceable - Chinks :marseychingchong::marseysaluteccp: stare in abject horror at the degree of incompetence and neglect of their fabulous new BRICS allies in latest RSA Navel drills

https://www.defenceweb.co.za/featured/only-one-of-sa-navys-four-frigates-operational-no-submarines-serviceable

A few weeks ago, our ANC commie overlords deemed it prudent to let South Africa pledge their undying romance to their BRICS allies with Russia and China in Navel war drills :marseysailor::marseysneedboat:

Much to the chargin of many media strags whom are overwhelmingly pro Ukraine and anti orc, the ANC basically didn't really give a shit about the scathing 1 star reviews our journ*lists gave them for this crime against humanity :marseynotes::marseybluecheck::marseyjourno:

Also men like my dad and all my uncles whom had to do conscription during the apartheid years and are all ardent anti communists, were all basically spazzing out and writhing one the floor with foam coming out of their mouths lmoa, at the sheer indignation of having our once proud navy basically being cucked by our Cold War mortal foes

But the REAL r-sluration prize winner prize🏆 moment was the barely disguised shock and horror our chink allies had on live television when they came to the horrifying conclusion what a 3rd rate 3rd world dogshit trash our modern military was.

I've been trying for two weeks to find live footage from SABC but that shit doesn't find its way on TV, so you strags will just have to take my word for it

Basically Russia has known we were useless since 20 years ago, but they are pretty good at diplomacy with they satellites, but clearly China is new to the game of inspection of their new subjects and they clearly had the misconceptions that RSA military & navy of today was still equavalent to that of 25 years ago lmoa

That fricking China admirals shock to hear non of our fricking subs were seaworthy :marseychingchongitsover:

It was like realising any future war that would involve RSA being a complete strategic dead weight Italian ww2 style:mussolini:

162
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A few weeks ago, our ANC commie overlords deemed it prudent to let South Africa pledge their undying romance to their BRICS allies with Russia and China in Navel war drills :marseysailor::marseysneedboat:

Beats being NATOids, just ask Germans, who had their "allies" blow up their sole energy link in order to sell their own triple-priced LNG to them and lure their industry away :marseywholesome:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:
  • Nixoncrats_for_trump : Nato does not have a functional military. The USA has a functional military. Bit of a difference.

lmao at least NATO has military capability. Anyone that sides with Russia at this point is a genuine r-slur, what do you gain by being friendly with Russia?

Shit tier weapons, an inability to project military force, access to a much worse economy?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>lmao at least NATO has military capability

Most of European military tech isn't operational either by their own admission :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And yet they're more functional than Russia.

And yet America is a million times more functional than Russia.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

US hasn’t fought a conventional army in 22 years

They literally admitted all of their combat has been against insurgents and guerrilla rebels

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No shit r-slur, doesn't mean they couldn't fight one.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Have you wrote the cope why US spend billions and couldn’t save Ukraine ?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The US have a fairly consistent track record of stumbling into third world quagmires, getting bullied by the locals until they get mad and leave before turning around and absolutely obliterating conventional armies.

The national chracter of the US (just pour money and technology on problems until they go away) is very well suited to waging conventional wars and absolutely abysmal in every other form of conflict.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Neighbors thinking Uncle Sam is incapable of turning Afghanistan/Iraq into glass desert. It's not that they can't, the problem is, they are dumb enough to think they don't have to.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I doubt Pakis, Idian, Chunk would like this

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And yet they're more functional than Russia. :marseysoycry:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Entire NATO has been emptying their depots and giving all their intelligence to that conflict, with highly limited results. What do you gain by being friendly with NATO?

Shit tier weapons, extremely authoritarian and frankly totalitarian international demands that cause literal collapse, constant failure of their idiotic economic sanctions, and a degrading, deficit-based economy?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"why yes, a country that was considered a serious landbased superpower that was a threat to all of Europe has been bogged down and doing very poorly for a year now vs a country with a GDP lower than Africa they literally border and is now considered a military joke, but let me tell you how the results have been limited."

"emptying depots" is hilarious too. Neighbor you'd have to literally 60 IQ to think the western economy isn't 500x better than the Russian economy.

Russia cannot even produce machine cowtools, the idea the sanctions are failing is cringe bullshit.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

GDP

...has zero influence on war capabilities. Again, your idiocy knows no bounds.

you'd have to literally 60 IQ to think the western economy isn't 500x better than the Russian economy.

Gazillion times better. Just like gazillions of women r*ped in Berlin and Kiev.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why yes, GDP has no connection to the ability to fund and run a military.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It indeed does not even slightly. Anything else?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Some would say GDP relates to the amount you spend on defense and also the maturity of your economy and ability to fund high tech weapons programs, and a stability that points to a healthy country that can innovate and develop military doctrine, but what do they know.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Some would say

Some would have spent far too much time in burger polisci courses, lmao.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

:marsey#sal:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

US aid two Ukwainye: $46.6B swo far

In FY 2022 the federwl gwowornmwent spent $1,112.4 biwwion on Defense.

i guess spending a whwowal 4% of our budget on ukwainye is emptying depwots :marseytroublemaker:

swource:

https://www.cfr.org/article/how-much-aid-has-us-sent-ukraine-here-are-six-charts

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do you hold money in ammo depwots ?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Holy frick Russia country with a lot of metal, sends rockets to space and it cant produce machine cowtools. Where did you studied ? That must be best r-slurred school on earth

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

![](https://media.tenor.com/t9f91LQWsM4AAAAC/breaking-bad-funny.gif)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Easier corruption, the evil west often demands atleast a minimum standard from their serious allies.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I guess, probably why so many tin pot dicators love Russia/china.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Honey is that why those game changers helped Ukraine liberate everything and US kicked Assad out, won against Taliban who weren’t supplied by 3th party ? You lost 50% conflict you started since 2000

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Was their fault for having corrupt idiots in the government trying to make a quick buck by making the whole country energy dependent on Russia


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17330111803968997.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.