I originally posted this on the currycels thread. But I'm making a separate thread because a) I made the other post 7 hours too late and b) I genuinely want to get some responses this time instead of just dumping my wordswordswords schizo post and walking away. So here goes:
I wonder how Burger politics will change in the coming decades with the massive demographic shifts going on. By 2050-2060, mayos will be below 50% of the population. Contrary to all the leftoids' smug-posting and the rightoids' seething, I think the mayos would mostly be fine. They will still be the largest racial group, by far, and they will probably still hold the majority of the country's wealth. In fact, I think that the biggest losers of the current demographic changes would be the 🏀s.
For example, take a look at this survey (https://ljzigerell.com/?p=9002). Unsurprisingly, outside of their (relative) dislike for mayos, all the POC groups do not like each other nearly as much as they like themselves (especially in the case of 🏀s). Thus, the so-called POC Alliance (if it even exists) would only stay together as a counterweight against the dominance of the mayos. As the wh * toids become less dominant and the Asians and Latinx become more and more powerful (around 41% of the population by 2060), I wonder if they'd still toe the (Democrat) party line and follow all the mayo nonsense currently pushed by the Dem leadership and upper-class leftoid mayos? Now, I'm not saying that Asians and Latinx would become a bunch of rightoids (although many of them come from conservative cultures). I'm predicting that Asians and Latinx, in the future, would not be so amenable to all the hand-holding policies towards the 🏀s. Would they be Ok with all the talk of reparations or paying more taxes to improve inner cities? Would they tolerate all the cultural attention towards black representation in the media while, for example, Asian and Latinx actors are underrepresented in Hollywood? Would the Asians still be quiet about the grade discriminations against them in higher ed.? Would they be Ok with their children being inundated with anti-racism stuff that's predominantly geared towards the black perspective?
In fact, I'd go so far as to say that Asians and Latinx would fight to get more govt. resources for themselves at the expense of 🏀s. Right now, even the mayo rightoids have to acknowledge the wrongdoings of their ancestors. They can only (lamely) fight back by talking about "muh colour blindness". The Asians and Latinx would have no such compunction. They'd probably not be browbeaten or guilt-tripped into following all the self-flagellating mayo nonsense. And given how racial identities have become so entrenched in burger politics, it'd be interesting to see all the potential POC infighting in the future. Any non-mayo (or mayo) burger here can give me some hot takes?
Will the POC alliance hold? Will Asians and Latinx finally break off from the mayo nonsense (both leftoid and rightoid varieties) and forge their own political destinies in 
land? 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i have a prediction that as soon as this happens all the woke shit in the media will suddenly devolve into being incredibly racist in order to pander to the race war demographic
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
..
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
To your second point, I wasn't talking about a race war. Rather, since white pride has been largely suppressed and other groups are allowed (or even encouraged) to display racial pride (and consciousness), there would come a time where the Asians and Latinx become politically powerful enough that they would seek to assert their own interests at the expense of others. They will no longer have to worry about sticking together with other groups for survival. And this might result in competition between the various POC groups for resources and such. I dunno, just spitballing here. Maybe my read is wrong and I'm just an r-slur.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I agree that the mayo indoctrination through the various institutions can turn Asians and Latinx into degenerates as well. But do you think there's a scenario where the rates of immigration and birth of POCs become so high that they can overcome the "system"? That is, so many different migrant groups come in such (relatively) large number and they congregate together (creating their own ecosystems) so much so that the mayo values can't reach them (or reach them much less). And all this would be going on when the mayos become less numerous (percentage-wise) and so all the focus won't be on them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If this could happen, it would have occurred two hundred years ago during the massive Germanic immigration the US experienced. German-americans are the largest white ethnic group in the US, but they became Anglo like everyone else. Of course pressures to assimilate were much higher back then and there were laws that made it illegal to speak German in public and such.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
has a multicultural alliance ever worked? yugoslavia with tito and the rainbow coalition of fred hampton maybe? but those had a strong leader. unless there is a common goal it can, but they mostly focus on blacks so probably not
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes, in India the Congress held power for decades by handing out affirmative action to every minority that asked. In India today, over 80% of their population is eligible for some sort of affirmative action [1]. I have no doubt any multicultural alliance in the US would go the same route.
[1] https://economist.com/asia/2021/09/11/indias-caste-system-remains-entrenched-75-years-after-independence
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
During the 1980s and 90s, would people be able to predict that some major media outlets and much of social media (which was nonexistent) would loudly support groomer parents with their trans drag queen whore child?
You're too focused on skin color. I don't see that as a major determinant of most upcoming "left v. right" positions about culture.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I personally don't care that much about skin colour and neither does my part of the world. We hate people based on their nationalities instead. My point about skin colour was due to the fact that burger politics/culture is absolutely fixated on race. It permeates both parties and pretty much all forms of media. And the flame of this divide doesn't seem to be dying out anytime soon.
Also, it's kind of interesting that you brought up the point about groomer parents and drag children. From my POV, that sort of stuff is predominantly pushed by (some) mayos over there. Yes, I know there are POCs who participate in that shit too. However, those POCs are only given the spotlight due to the "system" run by (mostly) mayos. Do you think it's just a weird coincidence that all the POC celebrities and politicians (e.g. Ilhan Omar) parrot all the woke stuff even though the ordinary POCs aren't any more woke than the average mayo? And even though the countries they immigrate from are way more conservative than the US.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is a really long way of saying you don't frick.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The global standard.
Skin color in idpol debates is more of a smokescreen, which is why I think this: "By 2050-2060, mayos will be below 50% of the population." is mostly irrelevant. That's all I was saying about skin color in regard to predicting future 'left-right' culture debates.
https://i.ibb.co/xJDShqg/a91bcbd9c95c.webp
Many "liberals" hoist up token minorities to advance their silly agenda. It's ironically racist / prejudiced to seek out and promote people mainly because of their skin color. Obviously, political values play into it, but they're used as a means to an end. A tool.
In general, that seems correct, but it's not weird. It's just another way of signaling virtue, or rather party affiliation / ideology.
Remember that we're on the frontlines of the internet, so we see the dumbest of the dumbest. Most Americans hardly care about politics except for a short period every 4 years. What we're discussing is mostly noise from media, ideologues, and other r-slurs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think in general it would be good if people care less about politics because that'd (probably) lead to more peace and unity. But if the majority doesn't care then the media, ideologues and other r-slurs, like you said, would get to push ever more esoteric stuff in an endless battle to win influence and power. Paradoxically, this would mean that the regular guy must get more politically active to fight against it. And, usually, that leads to the regular guy becoming another r-slur screeching about politics (see: all the magatards and antifarts). What do you think could be a solution to "break the cycle", so to speak?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Stop relying on government to solve problems, for pretty much anything. Otherwise, they'll keep playing into that loop and thus increasing its power over time.
Some people don't like that because they see government as the only or the best way to change things. They're weird.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Porn websites (which are almost all owned and operated by one large conglomerate corporation) perpetuates that approach / attitude / terminology / culture, by using the term "trap" as titles / tags / labels on porn in which transgender people -- especially transgender women -- feature.
The phenomenon is simply Objectification / Fetishisation.
When women are Objectified and Fetishised, people who participate in that culture are more likely to use violence against women. That's true for cisgender women and transgender women.
There's a large "machismo" patriarchal culture that considers women to be property of men, and considers homosexuality to be worthy of execution, and considers trans women to be simply homosexual men.
There's plenty of people in those cultures who have attraction to trans women -- but who cannot express that openly or publicly.
So they objectify and fetishise trans women in private, via pornography -- without meaningfully interacting with us.
In my opinion, all pornography (as opposed to erotica!) is abnormal, because all pornography perpetuates a culture of objectification, fetishisation, and violence against women. When those abnormal characteristics are comorbid with someone's routine sexual life, they become habitual, and that produces habitual dysfunction.
I did mention as opposed to erotica -- there are cultures that produce erotica that brings human beings together and promotes treating people as human beings with moral autonomy and promotes free human sexual expression.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context