Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is it really going to make them feeling better if you just swap out "female" for "women" when sometimes says "yeah, thats just how females are" or something like that?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well yeah. Language shapes thoughts and female is less human sounding than the ‘man’ that it’s too often paired with.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseysneed:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Language shapes thought

Leftoid magical thinking

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At least you figured out what part you disagree with.

If you have any language nerd friends (I think they go by the title of linguists), ask them about this. I’m not gonna long post about something I have no personal knowledge of but language nerds WILL redpill you on this particular thing.

It’s why rightoids fight tooth and nail over adopting lefty vocabulary.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

language nerds WILL redpill you

You mean bluepill

It’s why rightoids fight tooth and nail over adopting lefty vocabulary.

No, it's because adopting their vocabulary means accepting the premise of what is ideological gobbeldygook. If I start calling nonwhites "POCs" or "BAMEs", I'll have conceded the argument via some powerfully r-slurred newspeak for no reason.

This is not the same as being subconsciously brainwashed by a network of mass-suggested word associations, which is what turboleftoids now religiously think and use to justify censorship (so-called dangerous language, always as defined by them), and which is also reasoning behind the slow buck breaking of r/drama.

Basically, if you believe what you believe and want to be intellectually consistent, you have to leave, because you support the logic that would get the sub banned.

inb4 longpostbot

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You really think non-libs fight over every single lefty network out of sheer distaste for these peepeesuckers telling them what to do? No, it’s legitimately a fricking war for people’s vocabulary. Usually the kids.

Just because it’s inconvenient for our particular brand of irreverence doesn’t mean it’s not true.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You really think non-libs fight over every single lefty network out of sheer distaste for these peepeesuckers telling them what to do?

Yes

No, it’s legitimately a fricking war for people’s vocabulary.

Yes, where one side wants to change it for ideological reasons and the other doesn't.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

MAGA

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Slogan for a politician, not replacement vocabulary

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments
Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.