https://old.reddit.com/r/SexWorkersOnly/comments/q6jw7x/would_you_refuse_to_take_married_clients?sort=controversial
Top Poster of the Day:
J
Current Registered Users: 25,698
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Live commit: 3d41b79
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
All I know about female psychology is that for some reason they want to frick married men more than single men and this is how I know women are the devils creation.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Supposedly it's because they come off as more confident since they're not pursuing gussy anymore.
And marraige acts a a form of quality assurance. If another woman liked him enough to marry him then he's probably a good catch. Sort of like how rulers back in the day would sometimes seek out a single mom to marry because the fact she had a kid was proof if fertility.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What happened to the first kid though?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They usually came from an elite family already (no Matt Damon bartender wife for the Emperor, thank you) so they kid would still be set up well by his side of the family.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ah I thought it was gonna be more of a lion moving into the new group kinda thing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You mean when the lion eats the cubs? Yeah, you'd think he'd be ashamed, but I guess he swallows his pride.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nice
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
What happened to the first husband though?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If the guy was a an absolute monarch (and enough of a chad) he could just demand a divorce to make her available. Otherwise he'd have look for eligible, high status women who were already divorced or who's husband had passed away (which was a viable option because people died easier back then).
It seems like everyone is expecting some Game of thrones shit but the past wasn't that dark and inhumane.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Depends on the time period and locale as well. The Catholic Church was not going to approve of a ruler demanding a divorce, and children born outside Chruch approved marriage would be illegitimate heirs. The ruler could send the husband off to die in some pointless war though.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Don't listen to the lies about "quality assurance" or "confidence." The real answer is that women get spiritual pleasure from harming other women emotionally.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
HL Menkens feminist classic "in defense of women" does a good job of breaking down female psychology. Of the two sexes, women are the more intelligent and pragmatic. They don't yield to the petty sentimentalities of men. The foids superior emotional intelligence allows her to use these sentimentalities against men to her own advantage... the suffragettes, by defining power in masculine terms and therefore denying women their true feminine power, have done a great disservice to womankind
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Is this just wordswordswordsspeak for equal right, equal responsibility?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Equal rights, equal lefts. Square up ladies
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ray Rice has long been one of my role models.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I was raised to never strike a woman. Never heard anything about slapping a b-word though
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
By framing women as helpless victims of patriarchal power structures, the boorish, ogre-like "women" of the suffragette movement have robbed women in general of the ability to realize their full potential as cunning predators of stupid men
Concepts like "Equal rights, equal responsibility" is sentimental moid shit that the true Feminine has no use for. Her sole responsibility is to secure a man that she can dependably offload other potential responsibilities onto
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I'm going to have to pull you up on this one
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
My man menken also breaks down the differences between masculine intelligence (expertise, specialization) and feminine intelligence (pragmatism, flexibility) arguing that the latter is ultimately the greater form of intelligence
But fear not fellow dramatard, you are not forgotten... he also points out that the rare man of genius is one who, through voluntary celibacy or cute twinkery, tends to forgo women entirely. Though there is the occasional Chad philanderer thrown in the mix for good measure
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
R Drama reading club when.
https://gutenberg.org/files/1270/1270-h/1270-h.htm
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context