INBOX - "TRUTH Social" by Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG) pic.twitter.com/nE44mpSSfZ
— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) October 21, 2021
Title link is press release.
https://truthsocial.com/ The official site
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/truth-social/id1586018825 Apple store preregister
It's a twitter clone (as he claimed) with apparent emphasis on being able to make chats and group chats to talk about things without making tweet storms that clutter everything. He also mentioned once it would be similar to facebook in some way. Possibly when you click their profile it will be much more detailed like facebook?
According to the tagline
TRUTH Social is Americaโs โBig Tentโ social media platform that encourages an open, free, and honest global conversation without discriminating against political ideology.
So I guess commies won't be banned and free flying wild west fights will be commonplace. This is good for dramacoin.
Edit: time frame if no delays is start of next year
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Your example of conservatives being discriminated against is social media refusing to cover r-slurred smears posted by the NYpost, obtained via a laptop Rudy colludie paid a few mill for in Ukraine?
That's not discriminating against conservatives, it's finally taking a stand against r-slurred rightoid gonzo smears online.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Verified by Hunter's own business partner at the time, verified even by Politico at this point. Sneethe, cope, and mald.
Post proof, and who cares, so long as it's legit? NYT illegally obtained Trump's tax returns, can we ban that story from social media and lock NYT's Twitter accounts until they delete their tweets with the story? No? Then STFU u r-slur.
If you're taking a stand against rightoids and leaving leftoids like NYT alone, that is by definition discrimination against rightoids, u absolute dumbfrick.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Who cares if it's verified lmao, how are you missing this? Of what value to the public is a bunch of hunter Biden peepee pics? You understand that there are very strict rules against the sharing of nudes on social media, nudes that are posted without consent?
Seriously, give me a single coherent reason why rightoids should be allowed to spam peepee pics on twitter.
Nobody illegally obtained shit lol, someone obtained them and gave them to NYT.
That's not illegal. Spamming peepee pics without consent, however, is.
Leftoids are banned from social media at a higher rate than conservatives are, actually.
https://wired.co.uk/article/twitter-political-account-ban-us-mid-term-elections
Sorry, if you want to be taken seriously stop trying to defend porno smears.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The peepee pics weren't in the NYPost story, and Twitter never cited their "revenge porn" policy as the reason for taking the story down, nor did Facebook. Are you actually this fricking dumb?
It was the emails that mattered, moron. Read the fricking politico article. The scandal was never "Hunter Biden once took pics of his peepee," u fricking mongoloid
The someone who gave them to NYT illegally obtained them, u moron
Post proof that NYPost ever had peepee pics in any of their articles, fricktard.
How many times do I have to say that I'm not just talking about bans? And leftoids deserve to be banned at higher rates, so that proves nothing lul - plus, SV discriminates in favor of shitlibs, not hard-leftoids like Occupy tards - try again sweaty
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It led to the peepee pics, the entire laptop smear was literally just Hunter Biden peepee pics and fake p-do smears.
Which email mattered?
No they did not.
The entire story was a peepee pic/p-do smear.
Literally the only example you've been able to muster is your peepee pick p-do smear being removed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Then why didn't Twitter and FB cite "revenge porn" as the rationale for taking the story down, dumbfrick?
Read the Politicope article u fricking mong. can't u read?
Coping and seething with bare assertions b/c u have no proof
Post proof, u cant
It literally affected the outcome of an election u fricking braindead kiddie-fricking shill
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because it wasn't revenge porn, r-slur. It was removed for being personal information, which includes nude photos.
I've read it, can you point to which email was relevant?
Prove it was obtained illegally.
Almost all discourse around that laptop was peepee pics lmao.
Can you provide some data showing a story that was banned for under 1 day and then allowed to spread freely online impacted the outcome of the election?
I'm getting a serious eva vibe from you, where did you run off to after losing those groomercord bets?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Then u can't read to save ur life, fricktard
Did u read that? How is that not relevant u fricking braindead worm
THE STORY WAS CENSORED BY TWITTER B/C OF THEIR HACKED MATERIALS POLICY U FRICKING R-SLUR, WHICH THEY THEN SAID WAS A MISTAKE TO DO. LOOK. IF THE MATERIAL WAS ILLEGAL, HOW CAN IT HAVE BEEN A MISTAKE FOR THEM TO CENSOR IT?? U ARE JUST STRAIGHT-UP LYING TO MY FACE AND THINKING U'LL GET AWAY WITH IT LIKE A SMUG CHODE
Post proof frickface
The account was locked for over a week and both FB and Twitter intentionally limited its spread to or from anyone for way longer than that, u fricking braindead moron. And yeah, here's ur polling data, u r-slurred waste of space.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
how is the dealings of someone that is not an elected official relevant, explain.
Not only did said meetings never happen (proven btw) the emails happened after Joe Biden had left office you poorly educated buffoon.
Hacked materials containing personal information you low IQ moron.
The sky is blue.
It was literally the most shared story on social media the entire time, the idea it was locked for a week is pretty hilarious, an absurd lie, but hilarious.
Are you fricking insane you HS drop out r-slur? That's literally the most loaded and ridiculous wording I have ever seen in a poll. My god even by your standards this was incredibly r-slurred.
That's not real data lmao, that's some deluded rightoids asking a leading question that isn't even based in fricking reality to get a response they want. No shit most people weren't aware of that question, because they straight up fabricated their own conclusions.
The fact you just tried to pass off a Trump campaign poll fabricating a conclusion with dubious wording as real data is truly a staggering display of r-sluration. You've convinced me: nobody else could be as dumb as this, you're eva.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I'm upvoting you only because I want you to seethe more for my entertainment
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context