INBOX - "TRUTH Social" by Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG) pic.twitter.com/nE44mpSSfZ
— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) October 21, 2021
Title link is press release.
https://truthsocial.com/ The official site
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/truth-social/id1586018825 Apple store preregister
It's a twitter clone (as he claimed) with apparent emphasis on being able to make chats and group chats to talk about things without making tweet storms that clutter everything. He also mentioned once it would be similar to facebook in some way. Possibly when you click their profile it will be much more detailed like facebook?
According to the tagline
TRUTH Social is America’s “Big Tent” social media platform that encourages an open, free, and honest global conversation without discriminating against political ideology.
So I guess commies won't be banned and free flying wild west fights will be commonplace. This is good for dramacoin.
Edit: time frame if no delays is start of next year
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I love how oranges are blue, and the sky is green.
Good video going over this: [insert link to some r-slur here]
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This has become just a bigger and bigger problem with idiots tbh. They have some weird perception of how things work, and when that perception is clearly in conflict with what the data says, they assume it's the data that's wrong, not their perceptions.
It is pretty uncontroversial that conservatives dominate social media:
All of the biggest political pundits on social media are conservatives, a fact that is in conflict with the idea conservatives are somehow censored on social media:
This has become a very effective talking point for conservatives, which depend on eternal victimhood to justify their extremism, but it's just not reality.
For example:
in the top 5 most engaged publishers on FB, 3 are conservative. And keep in mind this is mainstream publishers - when you start injecting fake news/conspiracy theory outlets, it's even more dominated by conservatives.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And they would be even more dominant if they weren't being kneecapped by r-slur SV leftoids. Post actual proof next time, Pizza (you won't).
it literally isn't at all lol - u can be popular compared to others and still be less popular than u would be sans censorship and deboosting and etc.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How are they knee-capped lmao. The only people that get banned from social media are literal right-wing extremists, not simple conservatives.
In fact, can you point me in the direction of some conservatives that were banned for simply being conservatives?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We're not talking about just bans, we're talking about discrimination in general. WTF do you think every social media site clamping down on the NYPost Hunter Biden story was, u mong?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Your example of conservatives being discriminated against is social media refusing to cover r-slurred smears posted by the NYpost, obtained via a laptop Rudy colludie paid a few mill for in Ukraine?
That's not discriminating against conservatives, it's finally taking a stand against r-slurred rightoid gonzo smears online.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Verified by Hunter's own business partner at the time, verified even by Politico at this point. Sneethe, cope, and mald.
Post proof, and who cares, so long as it's legit? NYT illegally obtained Trump's tax returns, can we ban that story from social media and lock NYT's Twitter accounts until they delete their tweets with the story? No? Then STFU u r-slur.
If you're taking a stand against rightoids and leaving leftoids like NYT alone, that is by definition discrimination against rightoids, u absolute dumbfrick.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Who cares if it's verified lmao, how are you missing this? Of what value to the public is a bunch of hunter Biden peepee pics? You understand that there are very strict rules against the sharing of nudes on social media, nudes that are posted without consent?
Seriously, give me a single coherent reason why rightoids should be allowed to spam peepee pics on twitter.
Nobody illegally obtained shit lol, someone obtained them and gave them to NYT.
That's not illegal. Spamming peepee pics without consent, however, is.
Leftoids are banned from social media at a higher rate than conservatives are, actually.
https://wired.co.uk/article/twitter-political-account-ban-us-mid-term-elections
Sorry, if you want to be taken seriously stop trying to defend porno smears.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The peepee pics weren't in the NYPost story, and Twitter never cited their "revenge porn" policy as the reason for taking the story down, nor did Facebook. Are you actually this fricking dumb?
It was the emails that mattered, moron. Read the fricking politico article. The scandal was never "Hunter Biden once took pics of his peepee," u fricking mongoloid
The someone who gave them to NYT illegally obtained them, u moron
Post proof that NYPost ever had peepee pics in any of their articles, fricktard.
How many times do I have to say that I'm not just talking about bans? And leftoids deserve to be banned at higher rates, so that proves nothing lul - plus, SV discriminates in favor of shitlibs, not hard-leftoids like Occupy tards - try again sweaty
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I'm upvoting you only because I want you to seethe more for my entertainment
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The data does not lie.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The data like the surveys of the users of reddit?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, literally by every metric conservatives dominate social media:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Give me data that actually MEANS something and not a nakedly bitter politicized piece and I will take a look at it.
Regardless, this is not "conservatives dominating social media".
This apparently look at results only from a certain time period and one where conservatives used social media because many mainstream outlets were ignoring issues and, in fact, many social media companies censored the Hunter Biden story.
The Politico article is clearly a darned biased joke of a thing: look at this for instance:
spreading misiformation!
A study about social media that takes into account a period just before a historically contentious presidential election is USELESS for examining the norm of social media. And it's hilarious that Trump's own account was suspended while he as still President after years of lefty bitching that it should be.
This article is such a darned joke.
Laughable on its face. As though the media and the Democrats didn't do the same to Republicans/Trump.
The article is just a giant bitchfest about people like Andy Ngo, Ben Shapiro, Charlie Kirk and some others being able to reach an "outsized" number of people. What does "outsized" even mean? It's just some lefty bitching that some conservatives exist online.
But it is in no way any kind of proof that conservatives dominate social media.
It's proof that journ*lists are shit and gullible people lap it right up.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Stopped reading.
You have 1 comment to point out the following before being dismissed:
A) what in the provided article is factually incorrect.
B) What about the data/methodology do you find questionable.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Same.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context