Unable to load image
Reported by:

Does anyone know who the user "JohnnyAppleSneed" is?

So basically there was this REALLY dumb rightoid that would hang out in the groomercords before the election, easily the dumbest rightoid to ever exist in any drama community. He went by "eva" most of the time.

He made a bunch of bets with me and other groomercord users in which he claimed Trump would win Cali/NY etc and become president via a "major landslide." Months in advance I pinned my prediction he'd be back on election night declaring voter fraud and refusing to honor his bets, he then vanished as we mocked him and nobody has seen him again.

I recently encountered this "Johnnyapplesneed" user here that is a rightoid of such incredible r-sluration I seriously think it might be eva, he has a unique r-sluration you won't really find in other rightoids.

Can anyone confirm this?

49
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is it even a conspiracy to consider that election fraud could have happened? America uses such convoluted systems that appear to be possibly vulnerable to manipulation. Every documentary I've watched about it just boiled down to "how dare those rightoids and Trump call fraud" without providing much evidence as to how it can't be or wasn't rigged.

Also, I honestly thought Trump would have got a second term, he was that popular (or appeared to be). Why wouldn't the democrats or who ever say "he musnt get a second term no matter what"? Anyways that said, enjoy it when China's fricking you in the bussy you dumb fat r-slurs, democrat or republican, it won't matter in the end.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We’ll have a reckoning over election fraud when rightoids grow the balls to cheat

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They've been cheating for years lmao. It's actually been proven in court multiple times, they're just good at framing it as "election security."

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Our elections are completely secure, dipshit rightoid. Frick off.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

America has such a massive, disorganized election system it makes organized fraud basically impossible.

They've been cheating for years

:marseyhmmm:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is your brain on :marseypizzashill:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They aren't engaging in voter fraud, they're engaging in voter suppression and extreme gerrymandering.

It's cheating, just not in the way most people understand.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Who isn’t doing some form of voter manipulation? Dems bus urban youth in from the crackhouses and homeless shelters, and rightoids stop them from registering same day. And Maryland is the ugliest gerrymandered state you’ve ever seen.

This is how the game is played Pizza stop being mad when you lose.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Who isn’t doing some form of voter manipulation? Dems bus urban youth in from the crackhouses and homeless shelters, and rightoids stop them from registering same day. And Maryland is the ugliest gerrymandered state you’ve ever seen.

No they literally do not, this has literally no basis in reality. The entire "bussing" meme makes no coherent sense, if anyone was bussing voters around there'd be a huge paper trail.

Maryland also isn't even actually gerrymandered to any real extent, this is a common misconception where people confuse how the lines look with a full blown gerrymander.

To put this into perspective for you:

https://twitter.com/Redistrict/status/1449116353173065735

This isn't even getting into the fact dems want gerrymandering illegal on a federal level, Republicans do not. The DNC has to gerrymander at this point because you can be sure Republicans will, even so, democrats do it to a much lesser extent:

https://election.princeton.edu/2012/12/30/gerrymanders-part-1-busting-the-both-sides-do-it-myth/

Republican gerrymandering is far more common, far more extreme, and anti-gerrymandering laws are primarily opposed by Republicans, not democrats. Many democratic states have ceded re-districting powers to bipartisan commissions even, because they're r-slurred.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nobody is bussing

Neighbor I’m bussing

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

pizzashill moment

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

photo ID requirements are literally apartheid

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, but literally requesting racial voter data and amending your laws specifically to remove alternative IDs used by black voters is in fact racial voter suppression:

https://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/7-29-16%204th%20Circuit%20NAACP%20v%20NC.pdf

As β€œevidence of justifications” for the changes to early voting, the State offered purported inconsistencies in voting hours across counties, including the fact that only some counties had decided to offer Sunday voting. Id. The State then elaborated on its justification, explaining that β€œ[c]ounties with Sunday voting in 2014 were disproportionately black” and β€œdisproportionately Democratic.” J.A. 22348-49. In response, SL 2013-381 did away with one of the two days of Sunday voting.

1

Moreover, as the district court found, prior to enactment of SL 2013-381, the legislature requested and received racial data as to usage of the practices changed by the proposed This data showed that African Americans disproportionately lacked the most common kind of photo ID, those issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). Id. The pre-Shelby County version of SL 2013-381 provided that all government-issued IDs, even many that had been expired, would satisfy the requirement as an alternative to DMV-issued photo IDs. J.A. 2114-15. After Shelby County, with race data in hand, the legislature amended the bill to exclude many of the alternative photo IDs used by African Americans.

There was also a leak that exposed a republican gerrymandering figure, surprise surprise, it was race based:

https://newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-secret-files-of-the-master-of-modern-republican-gerrymandering

Hofeller’s files include dozens of intensely detailed studies of North Carolina college students, broken down by race and cross-referenced against the state driver’s-license files to determine whether these students likely possessed the proper I.D. to vote. The studies are dated 2014 and 2015, the years before Hofeller helped Republicans in the state redraw its congressional districts in ways that voting-rights groups said discriminated on the basis of race. North Carolina Republicans said that the maps discriminated based on partisanship but not race. Hofeller’s hard drive also retained a map of North Carolina’s 2017 state judicial gerrymander, with an overlay of the black voting-age population by district, suggesting that these mapsβ€”which are currently at the center of a protracted legal battleβ€”might also be a racial gerrymander.

The issue isn't ID requirements - it's that they aren't trying to put in place actual ID requirements, they're just trying to blindside and suppress as many voters as they can because their policy agenda is unpopular and they know that it is unpopular.

For the record, I don't even think this is an effective suppression tactic, it's the intent that makes it very clearly racist.

And for the final nail in the coffin, Republicans rejected a voter rights bill that included a national voter ID system:

https://usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2021-10-20/gop-blockade-of-voting-rights-legislation-reignites-debate-over-ending-filibuster

Why? I'll let you guess.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

^ the virgin "high information" voter

Since I have a job, I will keep this brief:

  1. gerrymandering is a meaningless term until you can define what a "fair" district is.

  2. of course repubs aren't getting on board with Dem national legislation you r-slur

  3. noooo it's impossible to get an ID from the DMV noooooo

don't respond, won't read your links anyway

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's not what those say. It's actually the other way around, and the data proves it. Might want to read your links again.


:marseyonacid: :marseyjam: :marseyonacid: :marseyjam:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm not even sure what grand form of r-sluration this is, but I've read literally all of it, and all of it supports my argument.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Read closer.


:marseyonacid: :marseyjam: :marseyonacid: :marseyjam:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao America has such a massive, disorganized election system it makes organized fraud basically impossible. In order to engage in any organized fraud here you'd have to bring in thousands of people all operating under different rules and regulations.

It's legit not possible.

Every documentary I've watched about it just boiled down to "how dare those rightoids and Trump call fraud" without providing much evidence as to how it can't be or wasn't rigged.

The issue is the claims they make are so r-slurred and incoherent you don't need much to refute them. Even so, every claim they've made has been soundly and clearly refuted by actual experts, they just won't listen.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm not saying there was fraud, personally, I think every corporatist and/or neolib politician in the West should be walled, in Minecraft of course, which is basically all of them at this point. Can't even vote for the more leftist parties down here, either because they're either too woke, or literal shills for the Chinese government.

Lumpens don't even know that every single party in my country has basically abandoned the working class.

Anyways cringe tangent schizo rant over.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Idk if you're American or what, but the election claims made here are shockingly stupid. They make no sense at all, like at all.

the Trump campaign showed up to court with their "eyewitnesses" and the claims ranged from "we saw an asian guy voting" to "someone called me a karen."

And keep in mind these are the ones they decided to take into court, so imagine how r-slurred the rest were.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They’re so fricking stupid it’s amazing.

They claim that China manufactured a bunch of fake ballots, and they were looking for bamboo fibers on the ballots as proof lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The issue is the claims they make are so r-slurred and incoherent you don't need much to refute them. Even so, every claim they've made has been soundly and clearly refuted by actual experts, they just won't listen.

πŸ€“πŸ€“πŸ€“πŸ€“πŸ€“

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Liar. How much is soros paying you pizza? Trust me, I speak from experience, no amount of soros bucks I worth selling your eternal soul to the blue devil.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do you even read what you write, from sentence to sentence?


:marseyonacid: :marseyjam: :marseyonacid: :marseyjam:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Refute a single thing said.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why?


:marseyonacid: :marseyjam: :marseyonacid: :marseyjam:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You can do shit like ballot harvesting, where you go around and "help" senile~~older and/or ~~dumbless fortunate people fill out ballots and then turn them in for them. This isn't actually illegal though depending on the state. Some states have reasonable limits like the ballot harvester has to be a relative or that the ballot harvester can only collect up to 10 ballots. Other states like California allow anyone to collect an unlimited amount of ballots from other people and turn them in, they are even allowed to be paid to so.


https://i.postimg.cc/dVgyQgj2/image.png https://i.postimg.cc/d3Whbf0T/image.png

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Of course election fraud happened. It always happens. And that's a good thing. r/LoveForElectionFraud when?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He was and is extremely popular. The thing is, he was so hated, that a LOT of people were motivated enough to go and vote against him. His constant trolling backfired.


:marseyonacid: :marseyjam: :marseyonacid: :marseyjam:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is pizzashill bait

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.