- 81
- 94
Since carp hates us now, I will give Britney Spears updates as she descends further into madness.
I've had it with the leftoid misandry around here. Russell Brand doesn't need to be placed under a conservatorship, though I can at least understand the motivation.
You'd think that dramaslurs would be all about pointing out that foid after foid who slept with or came close to sleeping with Russell Brand were displaying the usual foidish confusion.
Instead, they fall over themselves to insist that Russell Brand should be placed under a conservatorship because he's clearly not capable of making good decisions for himself. This is such a misandrist take on its own. How is it that a man who has sexuality is so triggering to the leftoids here? Is it because they can't get laid, so seeing a successful man get laid, even if he does so through ethically depraved and sexually aggressive means, triggers these SJW snowflakes into pushing a condescending theory of mind in which Brand has no ownership of his actions?
It's surprising to me that an otherwise left leaning space would fall over itself to deprive people of responsibility.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots300
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context