I know this is a popular r*ddit topic, but I'm curious if rdrama bussy conniseurs overwhelmingly have an internal monologue. Despite being tards, the average user here is definitely less tarded than the average r*dditor. The vast majority of people I've seen online claiming they have no internal monologue are foids, which makes sense tbh.
Do you have an internal monologue? And have you accepted that you're a subhuman r-slur if you don't?
- 274
- 60
Top Poster of the Day:
antonio
Current Registered Users: 25,667
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Live commit: 8b334e1
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
no categorical difference whatsoever. psychology is fake lmao. whatβs the difference?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The difference exists somewhere in this subject.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
feeling vs thought is not about language. both have words for them. animals do both. what
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Feeling is hunger, physical touch, fight or flight, physical attraction. Animals experience these without language. Animals have no capacity for self-reflection and do not recognize feelings as feelings because their feelings are their comprehensive reality.
Humans are capable of abstracting and distinguishing these feelings as separate concepts. By abstracting the concept of hunger as an impulse instead of raw reality, we are able to recognize that hunger itself does not mean we need to eat. I believe animals can "fast" due to their condition, such as injuries, but I've yet to see an animal spontaneously fast in the same way a human will fast religiously.
TBH, you're not wrong. To me it just seems like you're approaching the subject differently than me. This comment is my attempt to provide some basis for what I'm talking about.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context