I know this is a popular r*ddit topic, but I'm curious if rdrama bussy conniseurs overwhelmingly have an internal monologue. Despite being tards, the average user here is definitely less tarded than the average r*dditor. The vast majority of people I've seen online claiming they have no internal monologue are foids, which makes sense tbh.
Do you have an internal monologue? And have you accepted that you're a subhuman r-slur if you don't?
- 274
- 60
Top Poster of the Day:
antonio
Current Registered Users: 25,662
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Live commit: 8b334e1
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Dude between the three of you,
@ArachnoLibrarian, and 
@UpvoteIfYouCope I have someone who can't think if not in words all the time and if the ability to make words fails you sorta cease like one of those halloween balloons flopped over, but nevertheless sees reality a lot closer to me than the other two do:
Someone (Arachno) who seems to think that thought only happens in words (whereas you understand that you must keep your words close to retain your call it emotional essence, but that other processes of thought continue)
and someone who thinks language is math (whereas because you understand this part of your process, that you must subvocalize to keep yourself being, understand the limitations of the approach to assuming that because you can describe a grammar with math, you have understood the essence of language instead of merely its outline).
The Internet is madness. I don't know that it's possible to reconcile any of these fragments of reality but they are endlessly fascinating. Truly God is Great. I wish you all well I'm just too old to try and strip the condescension.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Mommy is soooo proud of you, sweaty. Let's put this sperg out up on the fridge with all your other failures.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
the subvocalize and must think in words parts were entirely true. When I stop talking I just instantly die and come back to life when I talk again. totally. serious. entirely.
the other two are unfortunately real. and are way too into language. it doesnβt matter, just leave it be yall, not important, words, meh.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I believe you: it's too, uh, specific to make up.
I mean I worry I'm picking at hurt feelings at some point. People get lost in language, man. The name of the thing becomes the thing itself.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
no I was literally making it up as a joke about thinking in words. when I pee I need to keep saying βurineβ until Iβm done.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ok now I see what you did there. Maybe. That's a clever reducto ad absurdum.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
So you didn't or you did leave your kids in the park?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context