I know this is a popular r*ddit topic, but I'm curious if rdrama bussy conniseurs overwhelmingly have an internal monologue. Despite being tards, the average user here is definitely less tarded than the average r*dditor. The vast majority of people I've seen online claiming they have no internal monologue are foids, which makes sense tbh.
Do you have an internal monologue? And have you accepted that you're a subhuman r-slur if you don't?
- 274
- 60
Top Poster of the Day:
antonio
Current Registered Users: 25,659
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS SITE GUIDE DIRECTORY Emojis & Art | Info Megathreads HOLES PING GROUPSCURRENT EVENTS:
Find Rightoid Drama
500 mbux per post, no limit/h/kappa Monthly Tournament
fighting vidya - Soku 12.3 | 10k+ prize pool | April 27thDrama: any incident, scene, gaffe, rumor, opinion, or disagreement that is blown entirely out of proportion.
Do your part to keep our community healthy by blowing everything out of proportion and making literally everything as dramatic as possible.
Rules:
- Asking to see who saved comments/posts=1 day ban
- You must be 18 or older to view this site.
- NO RIGHTWING AGENDAPOSTING.
- Discord users will be banned on sight.
- Don't post anything illegal.
- No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
- No doxxing.
- Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
- Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
- Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
- Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
- Absolutely NO misgendering.
- Absolutely NO antisemitism.
- Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
- You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
- You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
- You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
- Participation implies enthusiastic consent to being mod abused by unstable alcoholic bullies.
Related subreddits:
𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐩 𝐰𝐨𝐳 𝐞𝐫𝐞
Live commit: 8b334e1
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the topic was words. If you’re saying “we think in language but not in words” then that’s kinda vacuous and I don’t think it works like language but not words certainly.
what? They do complex problems. Not “operant conditioning”. What?
this is one of the places we disagree. don’t just assume it.
I’m also smart and know mathematicians who disagree with your statement? Smh
I have, and the complexities in said designs and interactions are not in words lol. Variable names are not the structure of code.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is what I'm referring to. To be entirely fair to you, there is still debate on the nature of their cognition. I've acknowledged this "fuzziness" of our current discussion topic before.
Who would disagree and how would they do so? At the risk of being a Redditor, I'd like to see some SOOOOOURCES for this.
You would not even be able to comprehend these problems if it weren't for language. Show me a raven or a non-human primate that can architect a software system.
The idea that language isn't involved in software architecting just because you're not thinking about explicit variable names is absurd. I guess this is just another issue with our divergent approaches to what constitutes "language".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Maybe that test could be explained like that but others are harder to
Google found several. It’s certainly disagreed upon
huh? words ~ communication, not intelligence. Intelligence is needed for words not reverse? Words may be needed to communicate how to use software, but not to directly use it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is why I brought up multiple times that we seem to be talking about different things at this point.
This may be yet another subject in which we are talking past one another.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
mathematics has a language. but mathematics is not solely a language. not hard...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Looks like you were right about there being legitimate disagreement. There are a lot of good responses in that thread.
I was approaching the situation from the perspective that mathematics necessarily requires abstraction via symbolism, and is thus inherently linguistic.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context