There are often complaints about "bad neighborhoods" and why good places to live near any major metropolitan area costs so much. That the focus on property values post-segregation to keep out riff-raff also keeps out youth looking to start families of their own. This is true, but if houses were cheap enough for them, said riff-raff would also enter, usually on government subsidy, and render it an unfit place to raise kids.
chuddier than me would disregard the role of the individual, and just make a blanket call to RETVRN to segregation. Nevermind the practicality of it, this would, in fact, subject innocents to that punishment and let bad actors remain on the crude blanket judgement of the color of their skin. In fact, this would disincentivize Blacks to behave, as they will be punished anyways, after all.
However, the de facto current system of using monetary barriers has its own pitfalls and perils. It has become far harder for a typical American young person to gain said property to start a family, and even if they inherit, that is usually after they become de facto infertile due to age. It increases the pressure to get into the upper class, as government subsidies encourage the poorest e.g. Section 8 to move into middle-class areas.
So what is to be done about this - one locks out the youth, the other the innocent among the colored? The answer is to take inspiration from the other side of the Pacific. Not the Japanese, you weeb-brained coomers! China! 
The Chinese Social Credit system - like a credit score for a person. Why can't we just use that, and block off neighborhoods - even cheap ones - and/or schools by social credit scores? Meritocratic and yet able to separate the innocent and behaved from the rabble destined for a jail cell sooner or later.
It accomplishes both being racially neutral - adhering to individualistic principles and keeping neighborhoods safe to live in without undue monetary penalties. It's not like we have privacy anymore anyways 
.
p.s. Disparate Impact Doctrine is r-slurred
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think the Chinese actually don't have a bad idea there. Most people don't know what they're talking about with it, though. Since there's not one uniform system.
They're trying to make China a high trust society by punishing bad behavior and rewarding good. It's mostly for business right now, and could be something like if you start a business to, I don't know, teach programming—obviously this has higher social value than a bitcoin mining facility, so you'd get a better rate on a loan or grants to do so.
Different cities though about the same thing with people, that if you did stuff like showed up to reservations on time or did shit like putting your shopping cart back, that you should be rewarded and those that don't should be
put in a camppunished, maybe by charging a fee to make a reservation.Being China, whatever they figure out will probably be shitty but that concept isn't terrible.
It sounds bad to western ears because we don't like the idea of people keeping tabs on us.
https://merics.org/en/comment/chinas-social-credit-score-untangling-myth-reality
(If you don't put your cart back at the grocery store you should be sterilized after so many infractions)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You are correct - the Cultural Revolution smashed previous norms, and the CCP regime is godless, so they need this instead.
Secularization and the Sexual Revolution and the downstream breakup of the family has done similar things to the West, particularly in certain subpopulations. So why not learn from China's experimentation in this regard?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's not a bad idea conceptually. But if people were capable of utilizing it without turning it into an r-slured parody of useful prosocial behavior it wouldn't be necessary. See the ESG grants and loans, US' private version of china's public system.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ESG is bad because it's according to Blue Tribe moral standards. It's unironically a good concept, it should just be used for chud purposes instead of soy ones.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're building a system that will be used against you. TND, TKD, or preferably both is easier and has no drawbacks.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
"Any system you build will be used against you. Therefore, you should build a giant genocidal war machine."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Pretty hard to be used against you when they are dead.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Purity Spirals exist, and the venn diagram of "racial outgroups" and "political enemies" is not a circle.
Are White Libs allowed in the ethnostate?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They are if ur not r-slurred.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context