https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/alex-jones-and-his-conspiracy-theories-are-allowed-back-on-x-160419044.html
- 182
- 86
Top Poster of the Day:
911roofer
Current Registered Users: 28,684
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Current software version: 468fded
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're not enjoying it. You are in severe pain and suffering extreme cognitive dissonance.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Can I just point out you always try to do this weird psychoanalysis thing with me and it never works. There's no cognitive dissonance because I know Alex Jones did the things he was accused of because I watch his show. Seriously, there's better ways to try and get me to seethe because this one never works. Stick with extolling Alex's virtues or something because that always bugs me. Or just tell me climate change isn't real. That'll really get me going.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Well climate change is real, the only real thing in the world is change and that applies to the climate as well. As far as the greenhouse gas theory and the steps globalist organizations want to implement to curb it is where I, or any thinking person, take issue with.
I don't believe in psychoanalysis but I can see plain as day when someone denies something they know is true in order to stay "secure" in the sense of not facing questioning their own beliefs, opinions, or biases. The ego resists even in the face of death, much less a matter of minor disagreement like this
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm not against re thinking any of my beliefs or opinions, I don't hold them all that dearly. But to you, climate change is gospel as an example
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Do better
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
But it's true isn't it? you pointed it out because it's one of those beliefs you hold onto so dearly you would never question or re think?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Can we be real for a second, since we're deep into replies that no one will read? I don't hold it as a sacred cow. I hold that belief because of a ponderance of evidence. It's pretty overwhelming. I mean think about it for a minute: imagine if we were wrong about CO2 trapping heat. What would that mean? It would mean that our basic understanding of physics and chemistry is completely wrong. But if our basic understanding of physics is completely wrong then how are we making things based on physics? How does your cell phone work if we don't understand the very basics of chemistry and physics? CO2 traps heat. This isn't in doubt. There's some argument and quibbles over how much of an effect it's going to have and that's fair. But overall, global warming is real and it's caused by people. If you want a great examination of the actual data, I recommend this series: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP
On an unrelated note, and I'm really trying to help you here, if you want people to think that you're not actually seething, make sure to upmarsey them. When you constantly side vote me while arguing with me, I know you're the one seething.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Thats where you're dead wrong. You go OUT OF YOUR WAY to provide an upmarsey in order to prove that you aren't seething. I'm simply not agreeing with the things you say so an upmarsey isn't appropriate, nor does what you say bother me enough to downmarsey. I didn't even check the votes BTW so who is seething?
and no, not all of our physics or chemistry hinges on the idea of man made climate change, not even close.
If you want to learn more Tony Heller is a good source
but at the end of the day, you have to look at WHO is pushing this agenda and HOW they plan to curb it. Once you start thinking from solution backwards into problem then it seems more clear. They have a specific goal and agenda and it isn't to benefit the avg citizen
also on a more metaphysical front
\Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context