Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He could have prevented this

Lots of stuff going on with ๐Ÿš‚๐Ÿšƒ๐Ÿšƒ๐Ÿšƒ๐Ÿšƒ and bathrooms I was told would not happen

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This didn't happen. Delete now


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187151446911044.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17093267613293715.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17177781034384797.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It looks like the explanation is right there in the thread. The comic is a parody of stereotypical โ€œcoming outโ€ scenarios represented in media. It psychologically primes people for the acceptance of such behaviors (both in the real world senseโ€“that of being gayโ€“and in the contextual senseโ€“that of being a demon designed solely to kill everyone). Indeed, Iโ€™m curious why youโ€™re not โ€œoutragedโ€ about the comic itself equating gays to murderous traitors. Instead youโ€™re upset about someone CALLING OUT this comic for its psychological propaganda. Indeed, not even that. Youโ€™re upset about the no-no word he used in doing so!

Are your feelings hurt by seeing a no-no word? What exactly is your problem with the post itself? List, specifically, what your problem is with the post. Is it really just the no-no word? Why should anyone care about your feelings when youโ€™re defending the institutional r*pe of children and the social spread of incurable diseases?

Why are you incapable of defending your ideological beliefs using objective scientific data? Not just in the contextual sense, but in the broader sense of why you seem to want to censor people for saying truth when it hurts your feelings.

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.