Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

well negative generalizations about huge demographics of people are dumb so no big loss if it makes people think a bit before doing it

-15 points

Well maybe, just maybe, people who want to promote feminism shouldn't say such stupid shit that leaves them wide open to a retort like that.

-6 points

If illustrating that wanting to "kill all men" would by logic extend to men who are murdered by police is antifeminist, then perhaps being antifeminist is not such a bad thing.

-27 points

why are redditors like this?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

circlebroke2 is like if SRD mainlined a cocktail of estrogen and soy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Women and internal consistency.

Pick zero.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not a kangaroo court at all. Imagine if Professor Dumbledore had used Avada Kedavra on one of the students who had misbehaved, then in his defense used the argument that "well it doesn't matter because the student had drank a whole lot of Alihotsy Draught before I used Avada Kedavra on him. How credible do you think a defence like that would be and how would Hogwarts (both teachers and students) react if he was found not guilty because of it?

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.