Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:
  • usernaw : whats wrong with lolipops :marseyclueless:

Are 2d lolis libertarian?

!poll_voters

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

is a "loli" just an "anime drawing of a kid" or is it specifically a "sexualized anime drawing of a kid"? if the latter then def yes. if the former probably yes with some exceptions

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Loli is short for Lolita, which comes from the book. The book is about an adult professor being attracted to a 12 year old girl.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I have read the book, it's pretty good. Nabokov is really talented at prose.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>coping loli lover coincidentally also likes Lolita

darn neighbor slow down

:marseyxd#:

:marseypedo: :marseypedo: :marseypedo: :marseypedo: :marseypedo:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's widely considered to be one of the best books of all time :#marseyindignant:

I may be unable to read past the first page without feeling like too much of a creep to continue but i will still defend it :#marseycrusader:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

ironically the first few pages are the only ones that make you sympathetic to the main character. He becomes more and more of an unlikeable creep as the book goes on.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyconfused:

The book is not pro-libertarian at all. It shows the main character as a complete narcisist who's obssesed with a kid

!bookworms this :marseyfivehead: thinks Lolita is a pro-libertarianism book

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

People who believe Lolita is pro pedophilia should seriously read the book. Is very clear to the reader that Humbert Humbert is a monster with no self awareness, it just happens that he's a fun and witty character (the parts he kept trashing Lolita's mom calling her fat cow lmao) instead of a one-dimensional villain but that's because he's supposed to be charming, always luring people towards him like a predator, and we only read through his point of view, he kidnapped and r*ped a 12 year old girl and by the time she was 14 he called her β€œmy aging mistress”, there was nothing redeemable about him.

!bookworms

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

nabokov writes a generationally seethe generating book that separates people who cant understand what theyre reading from those that can, gives lectures to an all woman college about how women cant write, is there anything this man couldnt do?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Kubrick movie shows this too, maybe not as effectively, but he's still a total creep

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The entire book is also told from his PoV. He's a narcissist with an inflated ego, he's always the smartest, most charming and handsome guy anywhere he goes.

In the same tone he tells us he's a :marseygigachad: he also tells us Lolita loves him, it might all also be in his head :marseyhmm:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think Mrs. Haze was definitely enchanted by the whole β€œsophisticated European man” faΓ§ade he put, I'm also convinced he killed her, the accident was waaay too convenient and just a few pages before he tells the reader he planned to drown her at the lake.

he also tells us Lolita loves him, it might all also be in his head :marseyhmm:

The parts where he claims Dolores β€œseduced him” are so cringe and is either all made up or something he completely misinterpreted in his sick mind.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

Can't believe @NewMoon just outed himself as needing a "/s" for an entire novel. :smh:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lolita is a pro-libertarianism book

It is if you have an iq below 90. look at the average /r/books thread talking about it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yeah okay in that case it is pedophilia

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How did the japanese end up using it?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because it's a classic book? :marseyconfused:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It comes from the book Lolita, which is about a forty year old man sexually abusing a pre-pubescent girl, so take a wild guess

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseycry: i kinda thought it was like lollis like how britbongs talk about lollipops or whatever because kids like lollipops :marseycry:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This neighbor so r-slurred πŸ’” :marseycry:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

you have a creative mind :marseysmirk:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyretardchad#:

yes

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

wtf i thought it was lollipops too

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseybrainlet: 🀝🏻 :!marseybrainlet:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

or is it specifically a "sexualized anime drawing of a kid"

Yes. It is associated with underage female characters being shown in a sexual manner.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

what the frick is wrong with moids

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's funny because I think it's the opposite. I find the grown men "crushing" on kids acting like kids way creepier than the hentais where they draw a 10yo with DD breasts

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseywoozy: neighbor both are bad lmao

i was talking about shit like leave it to beaver in anime form or something lmao, nobody wants to frick beaver they just think he's a funny kid

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

sorry I don't get the reference

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Leave it to Beaver, it's an old, wholesome show about a dumb kid named Beaver who gets up to all sorts of nonsense. My point was that just because you're watching a show with a kid in it, it doesn't make it sexual or weird. but ur talking about people who are like, sexually interested in kids. in which case yeah that's pedophilia neighbor

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'd be very sus if @Mello_luvr worked with a dude who had a leave it too beaver wallpaper or whatever the contemporary option is. Or if you meet a dude at work who watches drake and Josh, you wouldn't find that sus?

White extinction is long overdue :marseybow:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

in what way could it not be libertarian??? wtf?????


:marsey#spiderman: spider gang for life :marsey#!spiderman:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

they're not real? They also don't look like real children :marseyhmmm:

I think it's weird and gross but it doesn't necessarily strike me as 100% pedophilia,

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!chuds !nonchuds !r-slurs get the frick in here this is a loliBIPOC bullying thread now

:marseypedo: vs :chadlibleft: :chadnordic: :!marseychadretardtrump:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Don't bully him, he's neurodivergent.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:jinxthinkerhesapedo:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Add me to nonchuds you chud

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If I jerk off to a drawing of a woman, I'm sexually attracted to women

If I jerk off to a drawing of a man, I'm sexually attracted to men

If I jerk off to a drawing of a child, I'm sexually attracted to _________

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's not pedophilia though. If you jerk of to drawings of children, you're probably sexually attracted to them :marseypuke:. But being a libertarian's got nothing to do with being sexually attracted to kids. The pedophilia's all in the raping :marseyhomofascist: I strongly dislike the linguistic expansion of libertarian from meaning child male feminist :marseywoodchipper2: to meaning attracted to children, which is unfortunately a literal thoughtcrime :marsey1984:

!r-slurs they found out I'm an r-slur :soycry:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

R-slur that is literally what libertarian means and has always meant

β€œLibertarian-β€œ meaning child, as in β€œpediatrician”

β€œ-phile” meaning lover, as in β€œbibliophile”

Cope all you want, but if ur sexually attracted to children, you are by definition a libertarian

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pedophilia

!r-slurs huge cope in this thread

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jannies need to kill all pedos :marseywoodchipper2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Punkcels in shambles when pedos claim counter culture maximalization

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This reminds of the "traps aren't gay" argument.

!anime !metashit, look at this ephebe-weeb BIPOC! :marseyxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

they're not :marseyseethe:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@Ninjjer look at the word itself.

Libertarian - philia literally means attraction to children. It's a desire not a deed.

Pedophilia is the attraction, raping a kid is the deed.

!pings lol pinged

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!pings lol pinged

:#gigachad4:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Libertarian means you are attracted to children.

There are apparently non offending libertarians

if you r*pe a child then you are a child male feminist, we have words for a reason dumb butt neighbor

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm only a stage 1 libertarian unlike those disgusting Stage 3 libertarians

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you are non-offending no one has to know. As soon as you let it know you are a libertarian, or jerk off to CP, you are an offending libertarian.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Non offending libertarians are still libertarians.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Chipperfood detected

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseycringe2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The only real argument a lolicon can produce is that shitty drawings of small 600 year old dragon women aren't children.

But if you are attracted to actual children, you're a fricking libertarian.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

/e/scott.webp
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>I strongly dislike the linguistic expansion of libertarian from meaning child male feminist :marseywoodchipper2: to meaning attracted to children

No, the word for someone who r*pes kids is "child molester."

The word "pedophilia" was coined by Krafft-Ebing in 1896, who used it to refer to attraction and not r*pe. Cope.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But being a libertarian's got nothing to do with being sexually attracted to kids.

Wrong.

>The pedophilia's all in the raping

The r*pe is all in the raping.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the worst part is the hypocricy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>But being a p-do's got nothing :marseynothingburger: to do with being sexually attracted to kids

:marseysurejan:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Get in the woodchipper you sick frick

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

you can kvetch about it being harmless but when it comes to brass tacks yeah there isnt really a argument here

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

f I jerk off to a drawing of a child, I'm sexually attracted to _________

@NewMoon? :marseyconfused:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ur sexually attracted to me? :marseyhappytears:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyblush:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What about guys who jerk off to drawings of men but aren't attracted to men? Asking for a friend.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.giphy.com/media/qObxUdFyDhYbihzwlU/giphy.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You just don't understand sexuality. :marseyindignant:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I have sexuality every night r-slur

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

how does jerking off to drawings of kids not make you a libertarian


:marsey#spiderman: spider gang for life :marsey#!spiderman:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

16 votes and ur the only person saying its not libertarian lmfao


:marsey#spiderman: spider gang for life :marsey#!spiderman:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They aren't real but generally if they're advertised as a "loli" they're meant to look like children.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Loilicon is little the japanese equivalent word for libertarian (female).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They're not real but it still trains you to look at children as s*x objects, and the interest is still driven by pedophilia, which is dangerous once you get bored just looking at drawn kids.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

/e/drafts.webp
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you jerk off to drawings of feet, are you a foot fetishist or not?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

anyone who jacks off to feet is r-slurred at the very minimum

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They also don't look like real children :marseyhmmm:

I don't read anime or watch anime shit, but lolicon is that thing where the female characters are very small, typically and specifically underdeveloped physically, and have the mannerisms of a child, right?

I think it's weird and gross but it doesn't necessarily strike me as 100% pedophilia,

BIPOC, ground beef ain't sold as 100% lean, so let's just call this 80/20

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I wouldn't be surprised either way. Probably a mix of both. I do however, remember those little 4chan pngs and old drama posts where activists/politicians and feminist males that have complained and acted against their perceived pedophilia in video games and anime, end up being pedos with actual cp on their PCs. :#marseyprojection:

In reality, lolis aren't the actual issue with anime, nope. They are highly avoidable as well. The real fricking issue with anime is that 99% of it is soulless garbage made as cheap as possible for maximum possible profit. It's the only medium where a highly popular series gets worse with every sequel. Just look at One Punch Man and Attack on Titan. Putrid, a true reflection of the Asian bugman mentality. :marseybug: :work: :marseychingchong:

There's a reason the same 20 anime keep getting recommended over and over again to the new victims of "Cool Japan." I spit on em all. Frick em. :#marseyraging:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Anime is garbage tbh, I can think of 1 maybe 2 animes I would recommend someone watch even if they're not a fan of the genre. That's why I pretty much stopped watching anything, it's just slop after slop

:marseyboomer:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

AoT and One Punch were great.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:

one punch S1 was cool

kinda meh after

might have become bland after S2 tho i don't remember but it did get kinda boring

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Opm s1 is unironically peak adult :marseyfellowkids: animation. Unfortunately opm has literally :marseyme: been going :marseysal2: downhill since s1 finale. Even the manga :marseymeowth: is a twisted :marseybdtf: waifu :marseycatgirl: shonen shit caricature of itself

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Opm s1 is unironically peak adult :marseyfellowkids: animation

And it's still shit :marseyhesfluffyyouknow:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

TRIPLE WRONG.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

no U.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Those who sexualize Mayushii should be beheaded and thrown from rooftops

!steiners

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>not being a rukako enjoyer

>treasure A Mimic Ate 63 Coins!

rdrama confirmed mayuri shipper :marseyitsover:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ruka my beloved

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Mayushii, no. Kurisu on the other hand...

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Where is my "i dont care cause it doesnt concern me" poll answer?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.