I am a Spiderman CRUSADER who is lidl drip?
lidl moon i mean drip is an allegedly female power user, the mastermind behind the "man hate thread" (more on this in a second), and a staunch defender of null. whenever null is catching flack for some of his more r-slurred opinions (cheese isnt real, etc.), lidl drip is there to defend him, and vice versa.
in fact, even when null ISNT catching any flack, lidl seems to post directly before or after him.
lidls magnum opus, the man hate thread:
in august, lidl drip created "the man hate thread", a place for "female" users of kiwifarms to post about how much they hate men
this, being posted on a website full of r-slurred chuds, naturally created a shit load of seethe. its actually hilarious how mad people got, but thats besides the point. instead of letting everyone sperg out unfettered, the ever dramamisic josh moon had to lock it down, adding this special banner across the top:
the punishment mentioned (banned from the female board for a month) was often not enough for null and multiple users were PERMABANNED over this. like anytime null starts jannying hard for people, this led people to develop some theories
the geniuses over at onionfarms (a kf splinter ran by a literal r-slur named kengle) speculate:
so, fast fowards to jost the other day, someone posts this thread:
in the replies, multiple people call out lidl drip as joshs sock, including a site moderator:
this, of course, really upsets null
and he ends up locking the thread
a short time later, less than 24 hours, josh announces he will be going on haitus:
so, my fellow schizos. what do you think?
is null lidl drip? is he jost simping hard for a female power user? is it a different person, a friend of nulls (dyn, crunklord) on a sock account?
some additional food for thought:
lidl is possibly the same person as 3322
lidl has the same hateboner towards british people as null
lidl seems to know VERY old site lore from the beginning of the forum despite the account being created in 2019 and not used until 2022 (3322s account is also not old enough to know this
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
or is null simply not r-slurred, and is the justification for allowing a man-hate thread completely rational and consistent with KF's emphasis on free speech?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Not very freeze peachy, I would say
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i don't think you understand free speech.
if you wanna test null's ideological consistency, create a woman-hating thread where women are banned.
the reason why that hasn't been necessary is that 95% of KF is men and aside from that men in a women-hating thread want women to post there so they can dab on them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ah yes, truly girlbossing hard. Relying on simps for protection because you can't handle opposition is peak foid.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The issue is a small group of scrotes were posting throughout the day compared to the women. That same group has a hate boner for one woman on the site and try to start shit with her.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
now you're just seething
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's pointing out the obvious. And I'm just sick and tired of female hypocrisy and bullshit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Go back.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Where to?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh. I'm sorry.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
they literally
made a woman 
hate thread 
after this and he didnt 
make it men only
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
did the people running the thread want it to be men only?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Dudes rock
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
they do
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
yeah joshs whole "free speech" grift
is jost an excuse as to why his website shouldnt be banned. he very frequently bans people over little 
shit like having a minor 
disagreement with him in chat. lost lots of good posters to his ODD rage
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Shocking.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I mean, you can post there without consequences, but you will be banned.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
But you must allow me to shit up your website without recourse or else you arent a true
believer.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
there is freedom of speech but i cannot guarantee freedom after speech
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context