Think about what I’m doing. I am copying and pasting studies that the taxpayer has funded - with a little commentary. Then look at the vitriol. It’s not normal.
— Charlotte Gill (@CharlotteCGill) March 27, 2024
Twitter academics say these studies are *actually* brilliant. But are also apoplectic that they’ve been shared.
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1773012132356878836
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1772974254998323372
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1773016275775525172
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1773011217797271963
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1772999912537383344
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1772961478678589694
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1772917017055482299
"Academic" leeches respond:
https://twitter.com/greg_jenner/status/1772579856439452068
https://twitter.com/DrMabel_Winter/status/1772662746535887269
https://twitter.com/rosa_v_campbell/status/1772728325296771509
https://twitter.com/drrachelbroady/status/1772989436302700630
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Remember, before g*mers were really even a thing, we had our own science wars.
After the emergence and popularization of enlightened r-sluration (post-modernism), natural scientists and social “scientists” were duking it out over what the actual scientists were calling an attack on rigor and objectivity.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context