Think about what Iβm doing. I am copying and pasting studies that the taxpayer has funded - with a little commentary. Then look at the vitriol. Itβs not normal.
— Charlotte Gill (@CharlotteCGill) March 27, 2024
Twitter academics say these studies are *actually* brilliant. But are also apoplectic that theyβve been shared.
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1773012132356878836
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1772974254998323372
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1773016275775525172
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1773011217797271963
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1772999912537383344
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1772961478678589694
https://twitter.com/CharlotteCGill/status/1772917017055482299
"Academic" leeches respond:
https://twitter.com/greg_jenner/status/1772579856439452068
https://twitter.com/DrMabel_Winter/status/1772662746535887269
https://twitter.com/rosa_v_campbell/status/1772728325296771509
https://twitter.com/drrachelbroady/status/1772989436302700630
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The grain paper and the pregnant dood papers are both valuable, the first informs policy and the second is a legitimate healthcare niche. The question is why does it cost over half a million bong bux to investigate either. The hospital morale one potentially too since in bongland its a government service
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context