βYou shouldnβt take your family on an airplane unless you can afford to pay for every family member to have assigned seatsβ is kind of a privileged take, no?
— Aurora Borshealis (@aurorabrshealis) March 28, 2024
Clearly not an annoying Karen on planes:
https://twitter.com/aurorabrshealis/status/1773523958471741510
https://twitter.com/aurorabrshealis/status/1773526098489352580
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
Snapshots:
https://twitter.com/aurorabrshealis/status/1773500020031099257:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://twitter.com/aurorabrshealis/status/1773523958471741510:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://twitter.com/aurorabrshealis/status/1773526098489352580:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context