Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

focusing on kylie instead of this was the most r-slurred thing leftoid media has done for a while

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

proof that white people need to be the center of attention always

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No they knew what they were doing, nobody in reality really thought these crackers had a chance, much easier to raise a ton of outrage and clicks from framing the rittenhouse case as a close case instead of the open and shut case that it was.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No one gives a frick about slam dunk trials, and even after their lawyer got every single black juror candidate tossed there was no way these r-slurs weren't getting life in prison (unless the prosecution went for the death penalty)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Rightoids would have been much less likely to defend them because of the circumstances.

Much easier to divide and fan the flames with Rittenhouse.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Also kylie had the INCREDIBLY DANGEROUS bullet shooting gun with full metal ammo (can be deadly)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They succeeded in creating a framework wherein interrupting a riot is a bad thing and so is protecting yourself if attacked by violent rioters.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not if your goal is to make money with clicks


![](/images/16674454055116708.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's even weirder because I distinctly remember more people on Reddit defending this than Rittenhouse, despite being actually egregious.

Maybe it was too niche and the only people who bothered commenting were /pol/tards.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.