Unable to load image

Redditors take blank slatism to its logical conclusion by endorsing molesting the mentally disabled, and calling you an evil fascist if you assume people with Down's syndrome have trouble living independently :marseyretard2: :marseydramautist:

https://old.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/1de6n4z/this_ad_in_honor_of_world_down_syndrome_day/

This ad in honor of World Down Syndrome Day : Darnthatsinteresting

A lot of the comment threads are basically one person incredibly milquetoastly defending the idea that learning disabilities are an actual, real thing that exist, and then another person replying "Actually, if you look at the 99.9th percentile most intelligent people with Down's syndome and extrapolate to the whole population, you'll see that they're actually able to succesfully live on their own entirely off of social welfare with ownly twice daily visits from their carers! This also means you should allowed to have s*x with them, HITLER"

"Assume I can have s*x so I will" seems like a dangerous message to generalize

What danger do you perceive there, within or without the context of this ad?

[Words words words about how you can't frick people with a mental age of 8]

This argument kind of loses traction when most people who would make it, would also turn their nose up at anyone who has s*x with a girl whose boobs and/or butt are too small, or who's too skinny.

You can't say the mental age is what matters, and then turn around and say "No no, physical appearance is what matters!".

Idk what the frick this last dude's talking about, I think he's had one too many arguments defending 8000 year old dragons and his gut insticts kicked in lol :marseylaugh:

I hate this ad so much 😭 Just because a small part of the Down Syndrome Community can do these things does not mean you can assume that everyone can. [Words words words]

You missed the point big time....which is to not assume at all and instead treat humans as individuals regardless of the assumptions that can be made based their disability. But great speech!

Bayes' theorem DEBUNKED by GENIUS Redditor. If you think about it, not giving driver's licenses to children is also judging people based on assumptions, so why not reduce the legal driving age to 0? Sure, a few twelve year olds might get wrapped trees, but that's a small price to pay to reduce the stigma we're currently putting on children. Because that's what matters: the stigma. The biggest problem people with Down's syndrome have isn't that they can't function independently in any capacity, it's the stigma they get from not being able to function independently.

I don't understand this ad because not everyone with down syndrome has the same cognitive or physical abilities. If someone is being discriminatory based on someone having down sydnrome, then obviously that's bad, but being respectfully cautious with your judgements about how much someone with down syndrome might be able to drink, or how hard they might be able to hit, don't seem like the horrible travesties that this ad make them out to be.

The message of the ad is to let the person fail. Don't prevent people with Down Syndrome from doing things because you don't think they'll succeed.

I mean, these are very dangerous things. The assumption that someone can drive, or drink, or live on their own, or have s*x, when the average person with their disorder has the mental capacity of a child in first grade is immensely dangerous.

Imagine letting a 10 year old live on their own. How long do you think it'll be before the house burns down? Extend that to 14 and it's still the same answer. These assumptions are not without consequences

You teach people to drive, you give them s*x education, etc. Nobody's saying just throw a person with Downs into the deep end. The point is presuming they can't learn or understand is the problem.

Lmao imagine giving a 16 yr old the keys to your car and saying "good luck!" That's what you're pretending this video is saying.

Yeah, obviously the main reason not many people with Down's syndrome know how to drive is there's just no one to teach them lmao

So are we normalizing having s*x with people with Down syndrome now? Wild.

Yes because depending on their disability, they can consent. Not that wild.

:#marseywtf2:

All of this r-slur-molesting nonsense is underpinned by a sort of implicit Cartesian dualism and the belief that there's some ephemereal perfectly rational "self" that exists inside of everyone. This means that with the correct intervention--in this case, letting them do whatever they want all the time--people with severe learning disabilities could become just as smart and rational as Redditors. This is contradictory to all modern science, undermines the logic of offering any sort of accommodation to disabled people, and is only morally necessary in the first place if you make an a priori assumption that intelligence is necessary for a person to have individual worth, but is otherwise socially convenient, so it's mindlessly accepted even if the argument also explicitly promotes molesting people with learning disabilites :tayclap:

169
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Real talk, one of the things you learn quickly about working or volunteering with the mentally r-slurred is that they're targeted for sexual abuse. It's a massive black pill, but unfortunately true.

Sexualizing them or promoting the idea they can give anything resembling informed consent is really, really dangerous for this reason.

Frickers making me serious post on /r/drama again :marseypunching:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just like, give them s*x ed bro. If you just put them in a classroom and talk about s*x for a while they'll be fine. This is only a problem because those darn Christians won't teach enough s*x ed.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Taught by fat black drag queens ofc

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That give private lessons to kids below 14

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Frickers making me serious post on /r/drama again :marseypunching:

this is my hobby

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sexualizing intellectually disabled :marseyjoe: people is wrong.

With that said, Down syndrome is not always comorbid with a severe learning disability. The girl in the ad probably doesn't have a learning disability, just Down syndrome.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

For real? Is that why there was one downy on Love On the Spectrum that seemed a lot less r-slurred than the autist?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes for real.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah i went to high school and undergrad with this girl who had down syndrome. She definitely didn't have any sort of learning disability just physical traits of down syndrome.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Now you've piqued my interest.

Did she show any other intellectual symptoms, like being a bit slow at learning or social issues?

Was she treated normally by everyone else?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I mean I'm sure there are downies sufficiently on the right place on the spectrum to consent but shit you wouldn't see me take that risk

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yea that's why you teach the people with s-strength already to punch properly

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sexualizing them or promoting the idea they can give anything resembling informed consent is really, really dangerous for this reason.

Shitlibs will just do the usual thing where they cheer on the woman for being slutty but also at the same time demonize any man who would actually frick her.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My wife is the DON for a company that provides housing and shit for ID. That shit black pilled her real fast on the aborting babies with disabilities. Knowing that abuse is basically a guarantee is some heavy shit.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>IQ is not immutable. We can teach r-slurs to become intelligent.

:#brainletchair:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

you assume I can't learn Shakespeare

so I dont learn Shakespeare

I want to see a tard do a Shakespeare play

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17182352352102523.webp

She's still not serving you a Margarita lol, it's bright orange

>Yes sure, I'll get you a Margarita

:#marseyarthoe4:

Pours orange soda into a glass

>Yaaaaay

:#marseyspecial:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyyayyyytext:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Real talk: It's literally impossible to get an actual Margarita north of the Mason-Dixon line in Burgerstan.

There is something in the DNA of northoids who think a Margarita consists of:

-1 shot tequila

-1 lemon (yes, lemon :marseyconfused:)

-12 oz of pucker

:marseypuke#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

wtf

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

if it's normalized to have s*x with the mentally disabled maybe i will finally get laid :marseygigaretard:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't understand this comment. Are you saying that you will finally have a chance because you'll get to crush :marseyhearts: r-slur :marseyhammerpinkies: gussy :marseyblops2chadcel2: or because you're mentally :marseyloopy: disabled :marseyblind: and now people will believe :marseyparappa: you can consent?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the second :marseygunnut: one

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

oh same here

100%

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think r-slurs should be allowed to drink

How else is one supposed to cope with being an r-slur? Come to this website?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think people with Down's are generally pretty happy, it's the autists who'd all kill themselves if they knew how to

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Based chromosome kings of bliss.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Downies should be allowed to get stoned because it's really funny

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How else is one supposed to cope with being an r-slur?

They're usually not self-aware enough :marseyitsallsotiresome: to fully realize the impacts of them being r-slurred :marseyretard4: (unlike dramatards). That's why they're happy :marseydumpling: all the time without needing drugs :marseyjunkie2: and alcohol :marseyrussian:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

YOU CAN'T FRICK 18 YEAR OLD WOMEN BECAUSE THEIR BRAIN HASN'T FULLY DEVELOPED YET

:!#soyreddittalking:

oh you want to frick a literal r-slur? please go ahead

:#bigsmilesoyjaktalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

False argument. Redditors never say the top one.

It's either

>The age of consent is a dated, nazi concept

:marseysnootalking:

or

>SHE WAS ONLY 24, YOU SICK FRICK!

:soysnootypefasttalking:

and keep in mind that this is the same person

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No that's men on Reddit vs women on reddit

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

its not difficult. Theyre just evil and want to frick r-slurs

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A friend of mine had a job taking care of adults with mental disabilities who lived on their own, including downs people. The way he described them it was like they were adult children, much like your average redditor. He'd go hang out at their house and help them cook dinner and clean up and not burn their house down, and they would play with legos and video games and watch movies and shit. So if you want to think about them, they're normal people, but of considerably arrested development.

You'd have to be fricked up in the head to even have a conversation with someone about whether you should bang a downie or not though jesus christ.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

so they're redditors?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It says that right in the middle of my post :marseyraging:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

that's literally my friend lol


Follower of Christ :marseyandjesus: Tech lover, IT Admin, heckin pupper lover and occasionally troll. I hold back feelings or opinions, right or wrong because I dislike conflict.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Society should try to craft a framework to allow r-slurs to consent to having s*x while still having rules in place to prevent them from getting locked into someone's S&M s*x dungeon 24/7. I dunno how that would work but like, dogs and cats and insects and shit have s*x i don't see how forbidding them from having s*x for their entire lifespan is moral or realistic


:parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>r-slur defending its own kind

:#scott:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>brainlet who thinks in hieroglyphics calling others r-slurred :marseydisabled:


:parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hieroglyphics chads built the Pyramids.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The pyramids :marseypharaoh: were a gigantic waste :marseyradioactive: of time and money :marseyrabbitnewyear4: albeit


:parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There already are rules on consensual s*x as well as having sound mind to make such decisions, so all you're really saying is you want to frick r-slurs.

!friendsofmimwee, would you look at this. There is a redditor in our midst.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Having a job is a requirement for dating me so r-slurs are out of the question personally. There should be like an r-slur love court to work this stuff out is all I'm saying


:parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Loving an r-slur like yourself would be a full-time job. Come now, @MeowMixed. Don't be coy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#taylaugh:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#darkwhy:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Simple. Allow r-slurs frick each other.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes but do you frick cats and dogs, or do you let them frick each other?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Letting r-slurs frick each other sounds like a recipe for sexual assault :marseythinkorino:


:parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans: :parrottrans:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.


Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.