This ad in honor of World Down Syndrome Day : Darnthatsinteresting
A lot of the comment threads are basically one person incredibly milquetoastly defending the idea that learning disabilities are an actual, real thing that exist, and then another person replying "Actually, if you look at the 99.9th percentile most intelligent people with Down's syndome and extrapolate to the whole population, you'll see that they're actually able to succesfully live on their own entirely off of social welfare with ownly twice daily visits from their carers! This also means you should allowed to have s*x with them, HITLER"
"Assume I can have s*x so I will" seems like a dangerous message to generalize
What danger do you perceive there, within or without the context of this ad?
[Words words words about how you can't frick people with a mental age of 8]
Idk what the frick this last dude's talking about, I think he's had one too many arguments defending 8000 year old dragons and his gut insticts kicked in lol
Bayes' theorem DEBUNKED by GENIUS Redditor. If you think about it, not giving driver's licenses to children is also judging people based on assumptions, so why not reduce the legal driving age to 0? Sure, a few twelve year olds might get wrapped trees, but that's a small price to pay to reduce the stigma we're currently putting on children. Because that's what matters: the stigma. The biggest problem people with Down's syndrome have isn't that they can't function independently in any capacity, it's the stigma they get from not being able to function independently.
Yeah, obviously the main reason not many people with Down's syndrome know how to drive is there's just no one to teach them lmao
So are we normalizing having s*x with people with Down syndrome now? Wild.
Yes because depending on their disability, they can consent. Not that wild.
All of this r-slur-molesting nonsense is underpinned by a sort of implicit Cartesian dualism and the belief that there's some ephemereal perfectly rational "self" that exists inside of everyone. This means that with the correct intervention--in this case, letting them do whatever they want all the time--people with severe learning disabilities could become just as smart and rational as Redditors. This is contradictory to all modern science, undermines the logic of offering any sort of accommodation to disabled people, and is only morally necessary in the first place if you make an a priori assumption that intelligence is necessary for a person to have individual worth, but is otherwise socially convenient, so it's mindlessly accepted even if the argument also explicitly promotes molesting people with learning disabilites
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Real talk, one of the things you learn quickly about working or volunteering with the mentally r-slurred is that they're targeted for sexual abuse. It's a massive black pill, but unfortunately true.
Sexualizing them or promoting the idea they can give anything resembling informed consent is really, really dangerous for this reason.
Frickers making me serious post on /r/drama again
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Just like, give them s*x ed bro. If you just put them in a classroom and talk about s*x for a while they'll be fine. This is only a problem because those darn Christians won't teach enough s*x ed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Taught by fat black drag queens ofc
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That give private lessons to kids below 14
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
this is my hobby
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Sexualizing intellectually disabled people is wrong.
With that said, Down syndrome is not always comorbid with a severe learning disability. The girl in the ad probably doesn't have a learning disability, just Down syndrome.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
For real? Is that why there was one downy on Love On the Spectrum that seemed a lot less r-slurred than the autist?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes for real.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yeah i went to high school and undergrad with this girl who had down syndrome. She definitely didn't have any sort of learning disability just physical traits of down syndrome.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Now you've piqued my interest.
Did she show any other intellectual symptoms, like being a bit slow at learning or social issues?
Was she treated normally by everyone else?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I mean I'm sure there are downies sufficiently on the right place on the spectrum to consent but shit you wouldn't see me take that risk
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
yea that's why you teach the people with s-strength already to punch properly
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Shitlibs will just do the usual thing where they cheer on the woman for being slutty but also at the same time demonize any man who would actually frick her.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
My wife is the DON for a company that provides housing and shit for ID. That shit black pilled her real fast on the aborting babies with disabilities. Knowing that abuse is basically a guarantee is some heavy shit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I want to see a tard do a Shakespeare play
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
She's still not serving you a Margarita lol, it's bright orange
Pours orange soda into a glass
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Real talk: It's literally impossible to get an actual Margarita north of the Mason-Dixon line in Burgerstan.
There is something in the DNA of northoids who think a Margarita consists of:
-1 shot tequila
-1 lemon (yes, lemon )
-12 oz of pucker
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
wtf
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
if it's normalized to have s*x with the mentally disabled maybe i will finally get laid
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't understand this comment. Are you saying that you will finally have a chance because you'll get to crush r-slur gussy or because you're mentally disabled and now people will believe you can consent?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the second one
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
oh same here
100%
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I think r-slurs should be allowed to drink
How else is one supposed to cope with being an r-slur? Come to this website?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think people with Down's are generally pretty happy, it's the autists who'd all kill themselves if they knew how to
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Based chromosome kings of bliss.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Downies should be allowed to get stoned because it's really funny
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
They're usually not self-aware enough to fully realize the impacts of them being r-slurred (unlike dramatards). That's why they're happy all the time without needing drugs and alcohol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
YOU CAN'T FRICK 18 YEAR OLD WOMEN BECAUSE THEIR BRAIN HASN'T FULLY DEVELOPED YET
oh you want to frick a literal r-slur? please go ahead
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
False argument. Redditors never say the top one.
It's either
or
and keep in mind that this is the same person
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No that's men on Reddit vs women on reddit
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
its not difficult. Theyre just evil and want to frick r-slurs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
A friend of mine had a job taking care of adults with mental disabilities who lived on their own, including downs people. The way he described them it was like they were adult children, much like your average redditor. He'd go hang out at their house and help them cook dinner and clean up and not burn their house down, and they would play with legos and video games and watch movies and shit. So if you want to think about them, they're normal people, but of considerably arrested development.
You'd have to be fricked up in the head to even have a conversation with someone about whether you should bang a downie or not though jesus christ.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
so they're redditors?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It says that right in the middle of my post
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
that's literally my friend lol
Follower of Christ Tech lover, IT Admin, heckin pupper lover and occasionally troll. I hold back feelings or opinions, right or wrong because I dislike conflict.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Society should try to craft a framework to allow r-slurs to consent to having s*x while still having rules in place to prevent them from getting locked into someone's S&M s*x dungeon 24/7. I dunno how that would work but like, dogs and cats and insects and shit have s*x i don't see how forbidding them from having s*x for their entire lifespan is moral or realistic
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hieroglyphics chads built the Pyramids.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The pyramids were a gigantic waste of time and money albeit
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
There already are rules on consensual s*x as well as having sound mind to make such decisions, so all you're really saying is you want to frick r-slurs.
!friendsofmimwee, would you look at this. There is a redditor in our midst.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Having a job is a requirement for dating me so r-slurs are out of the question personally. There should be like an r-slur love court to work this stuff out is all I'm saying
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Loving an r-slur like yourself would be a full-time job. Come now, @MeowMixed. Don't be coy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Simple. Allow r-slurs frick each other.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yes but do you frick cats and dogs, or do you let them frick each other?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Letting r-slurs frick each other sounds like a recipe for sexual assault
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context