Artcel losers talk about how AI could totes be a CEO and how it's totes a better use for it than art.

As soon as ai can pitch to investors, run town halls, review staff performance, build team culture, hire and first all whilst being reflective and strategic, I'll be concerned.

Yup. The fact of the matter is even the best LLMs at this point can do none of that.

They can already: pitch investors, hire, and review staff performance (depending on the job)

Lol no

I've been saying this for months. Stop getting AI to do creative work like art and writing. Replace the most expensive role in the company - the loser at the top.

Said the loser at the bottom

That's hopeful news. Instead of starting at the bottom, we'll start from the top down. That way, they'll think twice about the whole deal.

Luddite

LMAO whoever wrote this article has no clue what a CEO does on a daily base

For real, AIs could never relax on a yacht with a martini while texting other people to do work for them

You clearly never worked with solid CEOs and have just watched a couple of Hollywood films based on this comment.

For the most part they usually are some of the hardest working people in the entire company

Hardest? Not really. Sure, they have high pressure to keep the business going on but it's not that hard when you have more than 2 brain cell. Ton of them simply have a big ego and think they are hard working people and wants others to believe this.

Then why don't you do it?

Heck, AI is literally fundamentally incapable of handling CEOs primary responsibilities. It can't make value judgements, and it can't interact with people. So it can't make value calls regarding the direction of the company and what takes priority, and it can't network partnerships, pipelines, etc.

it is sad i had to scroll so much to find the first adult answer..

Welcome to new reddit, all the working adults and techcels left after 2016 turned the site into an aids ridden mess