Someone edited the 'Wookiepedia' article for someone in the new star wars show. Death threats follow.

https://x.com/WookOfficial/status/1803517164776989131

Nerds are mega unhappy:

https://x.com/robbybabyrob/status/1803523286262849879

https://x.com/RealBennRBoyle/status/1803529046174716180

Star wars strongest defender:

https://x.com/steakdriven/status/1803594676760650112

https://x.com/steakdriven/status/1803612314274537790

https://x.com/steakdriven/status/1803596576566419733

Lmao, also loves trump:

https://x.com/steakdriven/status/1803569372356886633

71
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>If your response to an editor adding a date to an article on Wookieepedia is to tell them you hope they and their pets die, you are not a Star Wars fan.

If they care enough about spaceshit to get angry about it, they're clearly a fan.

You can also be a fan of spaceshit AND be a male feminist, or a serial killer.

Frick off with your gatekeeping.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There used to be a name for it, the no true scotsman fallacy, but calling it as such fell out of favor when redditors and the like realized they enjoyed applying it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Uh... You used an hecking fallacy! :soycry:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I cannot accept your argument as you used a logical fallacy. :#gigachad2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.