Unable to load image

:!marseypoor: poors of reddit upset at the notion that maybe squeezing all the money from billionaires :marseycapitalistmanlet: isn't actually a sound economic policy

https://old.reddit.com/r/FluentInFinance/comments/1dko6bk/some_people_have_a_spending_problem_especially/?sort=controversial

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1718992449326733.webp

Here's a funny bit where this r-slur things his bonus is taxed at a different (higher) rate (it's not, he's just r-slurred, it's withheld at a different rate, but at 25% not 45%)

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17189924495344374.webp

R-slur trots out the "Billionaires don't pay any taxes" argument again, but this time someone points out how r-slurred he is

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1718992449797273.webp

And finally, an r-slur who COMPLETELY misses the point of the simplistic meme and doubles down when it's explained to him (notice how the rational poster has like no votes)

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17189924498756804.webp

88
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That last guy is literally β€œBut I did have breakfast today?”

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's like he's conjured up some weird formula in his head where if you take 20% of something it is somehow more than 100% of something.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think he just fundamentally doesn't understand the difference between assets and income. Probably because he's always spent 110% of any money he's earned in his whole life so he's never had any real assets (like shares in a stock or mutual fund).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You mean the billiomares don't make 2.5 Trillion every year that we can collect as taxes?

Not like they invest the money in other shit (like technology) which increases liquidity, we should give it to DHS so they can hire 20 more political appointees that don't do shit because increasing consumption and contracts to government stapler manufacturers will make things better

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think they're actually overstating the usefulness of income. Seemingly something along the lines of "if they have $1,000, if we take $200 a year for the next 10 years we'll have gotten $2,000" without taking into account the $1,000 balance actually goes down.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No he thinks billionaires make more money than they have saved, which is probably true for poors like him who live paycheck to paycheck.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.