Unable to load image

So is the reason the debates were much earlier this year so the "people in charge" could wait after the primaries so Biden could be elected, but then handpick his replacement before or at the convention, circumventing the primary process?

Current thory: the "people in charge" (insert whoever you think they are) were well aware Biden was unfit for office. But they wanted to have control over his replacement. So they waited until the after the primaries, after he was "democratically" chosen, then ran an early debate to reveal how unfit he was, so they could replace him themselves at or before the convention.

Why else would they have held the debate so early? With fairly balanced moderation? And have the media almost unanimously declare him unfit so immediately?

I think he's about to get replaced and I'm 50/50 certain that it'll be Gavin.

What say you?

9
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think no cause 1) this theory is too complicated to be particularly plausible (Occam's razor), and 2) Biden's debate performance makes the Dems as a whole look bad, not just Biden.

Also, I'm not sure Gavin would be a good replacement. He has a lot of baggage like the French Laundry incident and as a California politician, he would be easy to attack with videos of San Francisco / Los Angeles street dirtiness and car breakins and so on.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

nobody knows/cares about old news LMAO they put the whore Harris as VP

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Didn't a court case state that the DNC can chose it's candidate however it wants because it's not a government institution?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.