!neolibs, !grillers, someone ping the boozers. For people who claim to be liberal (being for individual freedoms), they sure share a lot with the religious right in that they want individual freedoms curtailed to fit their Progressive eedeeology that's """evidence based"""".
Also there's this guy who whips it out and pisses in the Soylent lmao.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Funny enough prohibition did reduce alcohol rates and crimes but increased drug trade and organized crime. Whether it was a net positive or negative is hard to tell because it created a system that was increased by the following war on drugs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There was a minimum of 36 years between Prohibition and the war on drugs, that is plenty of time to figure it out.
Heck, there's 47 years between Nixon's war on drugs and Reagan's war on drugs - and Reagan's war is what people usually mean
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Not really when prohibition started the international transfer of alcohol and drugs that laid the groundwork for the inevitable uprisings of cartels. Small seeds lead to large trees in 50 years.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context