LARGE internal fighting in thread Chubby and DUMB BLOND TWINK COP gets forceful, then gets CUFFED AND BENT OVER

Indictment Text:

Deputies entered Ms. Massey's home to gather further information, and Defendant noticed a pot on the stove, and approved of Ms. Massey removing the pot to prevent any accidental fires. The pot was located in another room of the home, separated by a large counter.

During this time, the other deputy was clearing the house, and nothing dangerous was noted. Defendant then made a comment about the pot, which apparently contained heated water. Ms. Massey responded verbally and set the pot of water down on a counter in the kitchen. During this time, Defendant was still in the living room area of the home.

Despite his distance and relative cover, Defendant drew his 9mm firearm, not the less than lethal TASER located on his duty vest, and threatened to shoot Ms. Massey in the face. Seeing the drawn weapon, Ms. Massey put her hands in the air and stated, "I'm sorry," while ducking for cover behind the counter that separated her and Defendant.

Defendant, with his firearm still drawn, proceeded to close the significant gap between him and Ms. Massey. Defendant then aggressively yelled at Ms.

Massey to put the pot down.

Defendant then fired his duty weapon three times in the direction of Ms.

Massey, striking her in the face one time. Only at this time did Defendant activate his body worn camera. (please note, the body worn camera of the other deputy was activated when he first arrived on scene, and remained on during the entirety of the events).

After this, the other deputy announced he was going to retrieve a medical kit from his vehicle, to which Defendant instructed him not to, because of the severity of the injury. The other deputy still rendered aid, and stayed with Ms. Massey until medical help arrived. Defendant at no time attempted to render aid to Ms. Massey.

An independent investigation of Defendant's actions was performed by the Illinois State Police. An expert in the field of "use of force" reviewed the recording made by body wom camera of both deputies. (Please see People's Exhibit B subject to a protective order) The expert concluded that Defendant was NOT justified in his use of deadly force. He likened the scenario to an officer intentionally and unnecessarily putting himself in front of a moving vehicle and then justifying use of force because of fear of being struck.

Defendant's disregard of his training as a law enforcement officer, and his disregard for human life, shows by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to persons in the community. He has ample access to firearms, and has shown a willingness to use lethal force, despite the availability of non-deadly alternatives, when there is little to no threat to his bodily safety.

SHOW MORE