.webp?h=8 "Merry Fistmas!")
https://rdrama.net/post/293093/magatard-has-a-meltdown-over-tv/6877978#context
Let this be an example of why I stopped trying to argue with rightoids. this person is so wildly r-slurred, so detached from reality he physically cannot comprehend how numbers work. When backed into a corner and proven wrong he falls back on the "the cabal is covering x thing I believe up, so I'm not actually wrong" gambit.
What is the cabal covering up today? the size of the US electorate, apparently - you see, the population doesn't have more voting age adults every 4 years.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's not what I argued you stupid illiterate frick.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Eva did, you r-slur. Which is the person I was in an argument with.
The point is by no metric was biden the most popular ever, rightoids keep repeating that drivel because they do not understand total number vs percentage.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ok and I'm not Eva you absolute moron.
Except they're not. Literally the media did. Rightoids were mocking it
And you're too r-slurred to tell.
Go stock some shelves, cute twink.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i said (or maybe implied I can't remember) it did grow, because they keep dead old people on it and add non-citizens to use their "votes" to commit election fraud. if they did successfully clear the dead people off, and didn't add non-citizens, I don't think it would grow, because I don't believe legitimate citizens are registering to vote at a pace that exceeds the deaths of senior voters.
Biden's high vote total is because of the dead and non-citizen "votes". His low percentage is because Trump won with actual legitimate votes. The cheating was barely sufficient.
yes i understand number go up on graphs and reports, very cool
!chuds !nooticers
sure you can call me wrong, r-slurred, disagree, etc.
but the logic, as far as (real vs fake) numbers up vs numbers down and not trusting institutions due to a combination of incompetence and bias (in the year of our lord 2024), is sound.
of course, this confuses the shelf-stocker
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
EVA WHAT YOU JUST SAID PROVES MY POINT THAT YOU ARE IN FACT R-SLURRED.
You seemingly have a mental disability if you think the only reason the adult population is increasing is fricking dead people.
You have actual brain damage.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
let's see if you fall for the bait AGAIN
why did the population increase, pizza?
!friendsofpizzashill !enemiesofpizzashill
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Large demographics coming of age. For example gen z.
That is why the voting population increased. You dont understand how population growth works lmao.
For example if we had an aging population then the number of voting age adults would still increase.
Eva you, and I do not say this lightly, are the dumbest person I have ever encountered.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
and all those Gen Zs go out and register to vote, right? and they were all born by citizen parents, right? because the birth rate is at population replacement levels, right? and has been since 2002, right?
wait, no, no, no, and no.
that means if the adult population of "voters" (aka "the electorate") is growing significantly, it's overwhelmingly because of immigration. There is no other explanation.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
you know democrats win literally every demographic in the country outside of 50+ year old white rurals, correct?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
This is an outright fricking lie lmao, one of the most common rightoid arguments was "no way Joe Biden got x votes" and mockingly declaring Joe Biden the most popular president of all time sarcastically as to imply the vote total was unbelievable.
Here, in fact, let me prove my point:
Do you live under a rock?
I watched this argument develop in real time in 2020, they spammed it all over twitter. Which is exactly why Eva tried it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So were rightoids complaining that he had the most votes or didnt have the most votes, which is it, pizzashill?
If I cared enough I should compile a list called pizzashill vs pizzashill where it hightlights you arguing points against yourself, bonus in the same thread.
You really are the dumbest stock boy. Did you even graduate high school or got a GED?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
dude how are you not following this? I'm pretty sure I have screenshots from the Donald.win ON ELECTION NIGHT of them spewing this shit.
"NO WAY BIDEN GOT 81 MILLION VOTES, NO WAY BIDEN GOT THE MOST VOTES IN HISTORY, NO WAY BIDEN IS THE MOST POPULAR PRESIDENT IN HISTORY"
Rightoids were pointing to the number of votes, sarcastically declaring Biden "the most popular president ever" as to spread doubt about the vote totals. The entire point was to imply the number of votes biden got was somehow unbelievable.
I literally, in real time watched this happen in 2020, I watched it happen with my own eyes. Why do you think Eva said it dude? When I get back from work I'll fricking go find you the 700 rightoid conspiracies all saying this, all from the week of the election.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ok, pizza, sit down because this might be a hard take for you here, but donald.win is not reality. It's not even encompassing all things rightwing. It's not even a real place.
Because that's not what we're talking about right now, I'm talking about your talking points and you flip flopping. You cant keep running to Donald Trump for your whataboutism.
I know living on the internet and getting into imaginary debates with fox news grandmas is the only thing you have going for you to feel intellectually superior, I'm not even sure if its a step up from your depression food blogposting.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
THIS ARGUMENT IS SO COMMON THAT GRIFTERS SELL MERCH WITH IT:
I'm pretty sure Donald Trump himself said it, the RNC has said it I'm pretty sure.
It's actually bonkers to me how in denial you are.
Either way your claim that "the media said it and rightoids simply made fun of it" is demonstrably false.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Again you're talking about make believe places and I'm talking about what people say in reality.
It's honestly "bonkers" you're .. linking cheap as temu level merch that is literally made by AI capturing whatever buzzwords to sell and trying to paint it as majority opinion.
This is like the equivalent of citing those AI generates Facebook ads for shirts as people opinions.
This is the crux of your argument, ai generated merch.
Hilarious.
!dramatards our resident food monkey thinks merch made by Chinese AI is evidence for a majority US political opinion.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context