Let this be an example of why I stopped trying to argue with rightoids. this person is so wildly r-slurred, so detached from reality he physically cannot comprehend how numbers work. When backed into a corner and proven wrong he falls back on the "the cabal is covering x thing I believe up, so I'm not actually wrong" gambit.
What is the cabal covering up today? the size of the US electorate, apparently - you see, the population doesn't have more voting age adults every 4 years.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm not in any corner dude its literally publicized information that the fbi worked with twitter.
Except that's not what happening here. You LITERALLY said "those organizations" are not the "deep state" and I said they cooperated with the FBI to handle "misinformation" which is deep state nonsense. That was my response to you. Not me "substituting" evidence for something else.
Once again you fricking confused yourself and chasing your own tail with your own "gotchas" fricking hilarious.
Which is why you spend your time trying to dunk grandmas in the foxnews section of twitter. Right?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
buddy you got absolutely dunked here, no where in your article is the FBI talked about, nobody in that article worked with the FBI nor are any of them even involved with twitter that I know of.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That wasn't my argument. Why do you keep making stuff up? I literally quoted you on why I made that response. Why is this so difficult for you to understand? Unless you're being obtuse on purpose because you know you lost so you think the least embarrassing thing to do is double down on your own r-sluration.
But you wouldn't do that, right?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context