.webp?h=8 "Merry Fistmas!")
https://rdrama.net/post/293093/magatard-has-a-meltdown-over-tv/6877978#context
Let this be an example of why I stopped trying to argue with rightoids. this person is so wildly r-slurred, so detached from reality he physically cannot comprehend how numbers work. When backed into a corner and proven wrong he falls back on the "the cabal is covering x thing I believe up, so I'm not actually wrong" gambit.
What is the cabal covering up today? the size of the US electorate, apparently - you see, the population doesn't have more voting age adults every 4 years.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Except I did. It literally recounts cooperation between tech and labor and other parties that had aligned goals to ensure one outcome.
There you go. I explained it. I already know you didn't read it because you can't read anything that isn't a Wikipedia header from your search results.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
to be clear, you believe some outside orgs working to prevent Donald Trump from stealing an election is the deep state lmao?
What's hilarious is they were completely right: Donald Trump did in fact try to steal the election.
The deep state isn't "private entities worked together to prevent the leader of my cult from stealing an election."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So your reply here is confirming that
We literally have confirmation Twitter gets guidance from pro Dem fbi to filter "misinformation." So it's not what I believe, it's literally a confirmed fact. I know those are the bane of your stupid existence.
How do you steal an election before the election happens? You really are stupid.
Thanks for confirming you didn't read the article.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Simple: you refuse to allow early counting in select states, underfund election officials, and lay the ground work to lie about fraud.
The RNC did these things, do you contest that?
Your fbi drivel has no relevance to the article, this is you flailing.
Where in the linked article does it say this happened?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Except you said
Which makes it related because it established a relationship between a private company and an unaccounted government department.
Sorry pizza can't stick your head in the sand and call it a credible defense. You stupid chump.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What dude? What in the actual frick are you talking about, where in the article you just linked, which you used as proof of the deep state is the FBI mentioned once?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's not all in one link, pizza, are you seriously incapable of parsing different subject matter?
I think this explains why you struggle with a topic.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
lmao, no, what actually happened here is a thing rightoids do when they get backed into a corner, I call it evidence subsitution. They link one thing and then reference some unrelated thing while pretending the original thing they linked somehow supports their original claim, when it doesn't.
You aren't good at this bud, I've dunked way smarter rightoids than you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm not in any corner dude its literally publicized information that the fbi worked with twitter.
Except that's not what happening here. You LITERALLY said "those organizations" are not the "deep state" and I said they cooperated with the FBI to handle "misinformation" which is deep state nonsense. That was my response to you. Not me "substituting" evidence for something else.
Once again you fricking confused yourself and chasing your own tail with your own "gotchas" fricking hilarious.
Which is why you spend your time trying to dunk grandmas in the foxnews section of twitter. Right?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context