Unable to load image

[๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜] First Image of Daisy Ridley in 'Cleaner' - When activists ambush and take hostages at an energy company's annual gala in London, it's up to ex-soldier turned window cleaner Joey Locke to save the day

https://old.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1foaewt/first_image_of_daisy_ridley_in_cleaner_when/

Most Based Comments

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Hello I am an NPC and I am ready to be subconsciously influenced against environmental activists by watching this film (359)

Greenpeace is out there flying drones into nuclear plants to protest nuclear energy so it's not really that hard to be against extremist groups (-17)

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Is it the ex-soldier turned window cleaner part or Daisy Ridley (all 125lbs of badass) kicking butt? How could this sound moronic to you? (444)

Why does the woman's weight always come up in these conversations, when 90% of action cinema features absurd physical match ups by design? We never blinked at Arnie and his inflated physique and inability to fight or hold a gun properly.ย  (-17)

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Ah the good old "defending the poor energy company from the evil climate activist" heroA fight we can all get behindCheering for those brave ultra rich peaceful altruistic energy companies and against those selfish evil violent climate activists will surely feel really natural and resonate really well with modern society (386)

You didn't actually read the premise, did you?The activists' plan is hijacked by actual terrorists and the main character sets out to take them and the corrupt energy moguls down. (7)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

See, the problem with this complaint is that 80% of the time, if you actually paid attention to the media, said "comically evil thing" the villain does after they state their "good point" actually completely in-character for them.Making "a good point" shouldn't change the fact that someone behaves like a villain the whole time.The whole reason they're labeled as a villain is because they went too far and potentially result in the same destructive feats they're supposedly opposing. In these scenarios, the hero usually learns from them and addresses the point in a non-destructive way.Killmonger is a hypocrite who wanted to be the oppressor instead of destroying oppression.The Riddler never cared about helping the less privileged; only getting revenge on people he blames for his misery, like a larger-scale school shooter.Thanos was ultimately just a narcissist who wanted to be validated as a savior.The Flagsmashers, though, completely deserve this criticism. (25)

But that is the complaint. They're not saying it's out of character for those villains to be evil. They're saying the problem is that the villains were written to be that extreme in the first place since it prevents the anyone from addressing the problem the villains bring up in any substantive way, and they end up dealing a lot more with the damage the villains caused. (12)

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

If someone is the type of person to think that one data point constitutes a pattern, then I don't know what can be done, other than be entirely moralistic in our art. "The good guys always win and the bad guys always lose," and all that.If the message of the movie is that climate activism is bad, then I'll take issue. But I'm not going to demand that climate activists, as individual characters and people, are always portrayed in a positive light. (1)

It's not one data point. 1- the people held hostage and in need of saving are energy company corpos; 2- those holding them hostage with weapons are climate activists; 3- those climate activists are being manipulated unknowingly by violent terrorists; 4- our hero is specifically focused on saving the corpos (and yes, maybe a token good activist).It's like how Silence of the Lambs actually states the murderer isn't a transsexual (language used at the time), but all that anyone remembers is a 'man who wants to be a woman and kills women to wear their skin' (again, how it's presented in the film, not an accurate view of transpeople). AKA it comes off as a transperson who violently kills women in order to become one.Similarly, while the details of the script might present some climate activists sympathetically, and probably even throws in some shitty billionaire CEO, all anyone's going to take away from it is that the climate activists were optimistic fools who got tricked into violence ... (3)

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

Ah another movie GROOMING people into believing that Activists are a threat and the problem. It's such a typical movie trope done by the rich. Oh you like saving the environment? Here's a movie where the villain is like you butโ€ฆ takes it too far!!!!Oh you want to end economic disparity? Here's a movie where the villain is like you butโ€ฆ.. takes it too FARR!!!!Oh you want a movie where people want the military to stop fricking devastating their country? Here's a movie where the villains share your view but take it to FAARRRR!!!!!!!sit down. Shut the frick up. Enjoy this shitty movie we paid 150 million for to lose money. I am so fricking sick of Hollywood ect making real causes, issues, the bad guy in their movies. It's totally a fricking thing. (2)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/NotBannedAccount419

Score: ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Number of comments: 4

Average angriness: ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Maximum angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

Minimum angriness: ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining! :marseyminer:

:marppy: autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. :marseycapitalistmanlet: Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion :marseyjamming:

52
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is like Die Hard except everything replaced in a superficial way

Terrorist are now activist

Dude is now a chick

Cop is now a solider

Christmas is now "an annual gala"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wtf lmao that's exactly what this is they longhoused the whole thing (i don't really know what longhouse means)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Hello I am an NPC and I am ready to be subconsciously influenced against environmental activists by watching this film

Is this neighbour serious? When does their stereotype of Hollywood date from, the Hayes Code era?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You are a blind r-slur if you don't think Hollywood is pushing out subconscious propaganda all the time.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They've admitted to it plenty of times

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

[the point]

[your head]

Look at who's funding e.g. the Climate Emergency Fund. Environmental activists and Hollywood luvvies are on the same team, with the latter openly supporting the former, both financially and via the messages in their movies. Difficult to think of a more absurd claim to victimhood than a climate activist (or at least a redditor who supports climate activism in principle) saying Hollywood is biased against them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Something something nuclear

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Hello I am an NPC and I am ready to be subconsciously influenced against environmental activists by watching this film (359)

Thankfully, as a redditor, I could never be influenced by activism, for example by blindly worshiping activists despite not actually knowing any of them IRL or joining or donating to their causes or going to a protest or whatever :smugjak: I mean who's going to moderate my subreddit if I get arrested?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

she will switch sides mid film

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

IT'S DIE HARD

WITH A TWIST

:marseyrick:


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17278347330109043.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17282249849557173.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We're subverting expectations!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

BASED. I hope some of the activists get away at the end, and the mid credits final scene is her running them over in an SUV on a street they're blocking to protest.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The only chance this movie has at being good is if the main bad guy is Greta and after Daisy kills her she works in a "how dare you" quip

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Rolling for Rittenhouse cameo

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I can already hear Redditors screaming at the idea that activists might be the bad guys. Even if they don't know what kind of activists, the mere connotations of the word are enough to make them seethe at the idea that they could be bad.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

any movie defeated by the physiological s*x differences wiki article is inherently trash out the gate

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

good day for grifter youtubers "woke hard massive failure flops dei industry in shambles go woke go broke"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseywould:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

she ugly

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Her entire acting range is this is face:

:#marseypikachu2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Still not sure if she can even act.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

With washboard tits.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wait, Buffalo Bill wasnt trans?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That was part of the plot of the movie, yes.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They took this from you.

Snapshots:

https://old.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1foaewt/first_image_of_daisy_ridley_in_cleaner_when/:

Greenpeace is out there flying drones into nuclear plants to protest nuclear energy so it's not really that hard to be against extremist groups:

Why does the woman's weight always come up in these conversations, when 90% of action cinema features absurd physical match ups by design? We never blinked at Arnie and his inflated physique and inability to fight or hold a gun properly.ย :

You didn't actually read the premise, did you?The activists' plan is hijacked by actual terrorists and the main character sets out to take them and the corrupt energy moguls down.:

But that is the complaint. They're not saying it's out of character for those villains to be evil. They're saying the problem is that the villains were written to be that extreme in the first place since it prevents the anyone from addressing the problem the villains bring up in any substantive way, and they end up dealing a lot more with the damage the villains caused.:

It's not one data point. 1- the people held hostage and in need of saving are energy company corpos; 2- those holding them hostage with weapons are climate activists; 3- those climate activists are being manipulated unknowingly by violent terrorists; 4- our hero is specifically focused on saving the corpos (and yes, maybe a token good activist).It's like how Silence of the Lambs actually states the murderer isn't a transsexual (language used at the time), but all that anyone remembers is a 'man who wants to be a woman and kills women to wear their skin' (again, how it's presented in the film, not an accurate view of transpeople). AKA it comes off as a transperson who violently kills women in order to become one.Similarly, while the details of the script might present some climate activists sympathetically, and probably even throws in some shitty billionaire CEO, all anyone's going to take away from it is that the climate activists were optimistic fools who got tricked into violence ...:

Ah another movie GROOMING people into believing that Activists are a threat and the problem. It's such a typical movie trope done by the rich. Oh you like saving the environment? Here's a movie where the villain is like you butโ€ฆ takes it too far!!!!Oh you want to end economic disparity? Here's a movie where the villain is like you butโ€ฆ.. takes it too FARR!!!!Oh you want a movie where people want the military to stop fricking devastating their country? Here's a movie where the villains share your view but take it to FAARRRR!!!!!!!sit down. Shut the frick up. Enjoy this shitty movie we paid 150 million for to lose money. I am so fricking sick of Hollywood ect making real causes, issues, the bad guy in their movies. It's totally a fricking thing.:

/u/NotBannedAccount419:

๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hello Snappy,

We've observed your mention of a Reddit username in one of your comments. CrossTalk PM is dedicated to maintaining a respectful and safe space for discussions. As part of our efforts to ensure privacy and respect for all users, the Reddit user mentioned has been notified. Please take a moment to reflect on the implications of mentioning others without their consent and strive to maintain a respectful discourse in our community.

Thank you,

CrossTalk PM - Automated Message (Unmonitored Account)

Please contact @J with questions

Join https://rdrama.net/!friendsofcrosstalkpm to be pinged for hits

Join !superfriendsofcrosstalkpm to be pinged when we ping

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.