Angriest Comments
Angriness: ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก
What the frick is this argumentMinority communities are specifically targeted by pro-choice campaigns because fetal tissue + organs are ridiculously valuable to pharmaceutical and cosmetic companies. It's no exaggeration to say that the minority underclass of the United States is being liquidated to prop up US oligarchs. Did you forget that fetuses have rights too?1) Men can't become pregnant, so they can't decide to have an elective abortion. Whatever right to abortion that purportedly exists doesn't apply to them for that reason. Full stop.2) Negative rights are actions that demand non-interference from others in order to function. Abortion, as an action, requires at least two participants. That's why it categorically cannot be classified as a negative right. (1)
Angriness: ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก
To answer your questions: YESConservatives would simply never even think to regulate the freedom of men to be sovereign over their own bodies like this. Their base wouldn't have it.Their resistance to gun control is a good parallel. Guns are the number one cause of death of minors, yet Conservatives refuse to act. Curious how that concern with the life of children ends the moment protecting them no longer involves controlling women.There is zero room to call such hypocrisy "pro life" IMO. (1)
Angriness: ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก
Roe was problematic for several reasons.The first was that it prohibited states from deciding the issue of abortion. Anti-abortion states were forced to accept abortion regardless of the will of the electorate. The second was that it invented a negative right out of whole cloth by asserting that women (and only specifically women) have an inalienable right to abortion based on medical privacy.Ignoring for the moment that all rights are universal and inalienable, SCOTUS asserted that a positive right was essentially a negative right, and that no state could interfere for that reason. (1)
Biggest Lolcow: /u/OfTheAtom
Score: ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐
Number of comments: 9
Average angriness: ๐๐๐๐๐
Maximum angriness: ๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก๐ก
Minimum angriness: ๐๐๐๐๐
NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!
autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
These people are all avoiding the elephant in the room about how the first ruling was a tortured, activist ruling and didn't address any of the arguments. Redditors can't handle that maybe the democrat party could've passed a federal abortion law when they had super majorities but choose not to on top of abortion not being as popular as they want to think.
Wealthy women are just as r-slurred near me, putting slacktivist signs in their lawns "regulate guns, not women', "in this house....", "be kind", etc.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It would literally kill some of these people to look at things objectively and admit they might've been wrong for once.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Redditards just comprehend r*pe and palestinian lives matter, both of which they support.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context