Unable to load image

Musk (spacex) suing California because some foid couldn't keep her mouth shut

https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-spacex-launches-california-coastal-commission-2024-10

"Elon Musk is hopping about the country, spewing and tweeting political falsehoods and attacking FEMA while claiming his desire to help the hurricane victims with free Starlink access to the internet," she said before the vote on Thursday.

"It appears that rather than prioritizing the welfare of SpaceX employees and the environment, the focus has been on profit maximization," she added.

:marseyfoidretard: causes your state to get sued.

116
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>"You could argue that it's bringing in politics, but this is a political matter to some extent because it involves the US government, it involves the Coastal Commission."

This foid thinks that any public entity has a right to engage in viewpoint discrimination because politics is politics? lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

they can lol, especially the way she worded it. musk will likely lose this one.

Musk isn't entittled to government welfare.

I'm thrilled dems are starting to retaliate against chuds now on a state level.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pizza is a better lawyer than whoever Musk, the world's richest man, retains. Impressive!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

did those lawyers he retained get him out of buying twitter?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

lawyers can't magically undo r-sluration

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And thats my point.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

in this case it's the california bureaucrat that is the r-slur who can't be saved

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Can lawyers do anything if they're good enough?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Whats the trump record in court now? 0-453? Chuds have a habit of being legally r-slurred. Almost all good lawyers are libtards and wont even work for them.

Theres a reason the democratic party is called "the laywer lobby."

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah hopefully when Musk goes to court the judge just jails him for being a chud haha that would be hilarious haha

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It would be.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Discrimination for political views is actually illegal in California, r-slur.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao we'll see.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're literally r-slurred. Her statements were literally said these statements at a meeting that they voted to reject the launch plans.

Musk isn't entittled to government welfare.

If its reject on the basis of his speech than its a prima facie 1A violation.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Welfare denied, muskrat.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Please explain how California blocking military launches is wellfare.

muskrat

Cope. He doesn't give a shit about an r-slured who uses food stamps on expired meat and brags about going on dates to Panera bread.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Cope

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>entittled

:furryboobs:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Being in a one-party state does make you forget there are occassionaly consequences to not keeping your mouth shut.

See Latinx politicians in SoCal getting hot-mic'ed talking shit about the Blacks in Spanish.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_San_Francisco_mayoral_election

There's a reason why Wikipedia doesn't even mention SF's mayor candidates' political parties anymore lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

London Breed?!?!?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

this is plebbit's "everything is political" but IRL

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's not plebbit, that's just Marxism. Which should explain a great deal.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i bet she's too fat to be a true marxist

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah no shit, the point of that narrative was always to engage in viewpoint discrimination.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They have a right to discriminate against bad opinions because they're doing that in ✨good faith✨

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She learned how to argue from srd and thought the same approach would work in the real world.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She's definitely an /r/politics user

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They're on the right side of the history chud

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Unironic political science foid professor.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Free speech doesn't mean no consequence for the speech.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

When it comes to state actions in many cases it does.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.