"I'm sure our readers in South Carolina are looking through phone books and public records right now to search and destroy the worthless carcass of David Padgett, and to pour two litres of well-matured urine through the letterbox of South Carolina SuperNet for having no discernible Acceptable Usage Policy." - Rev Dr David Gerard sneeds about the Usenet troll known as NetWeasel

On 16 Mar 1996 00:41:30 GMT, Ray (d....@ rl.net) wrote:

David Gerard (g....@ c.u.au) wrote:

On a more general note, I might say that alt.gothic is getting better at handling these flaming maroons. The nice goths stand back from the flaming loser (killfile at will) and the nasty frickers compete to see who can slice 'n' dice the offender as aesthetically as possible. Eventually, the flamer either attests to cognition or just goes off to bother someone else. Or gets his account pulled. Or his provider multiply ping-bombed. But I didn't suggest that last, and ISERIOUSLY recommend you not do it.

Note that this latest slew (Arsey, et al) has every indication of an invasion... (Lurch who started posting about a week before siding with him, etc.) the docs thread is up to what 200some posts now? Killfiling or ignoring would be better than playing into their hands.

Lurch has been this way before, and is at least entertaining in passing (IMHO). Not linked to Arsey as such, at my guess.

"R.C.Richards" and "M.W.Marlow" are two different accounts used by a troll named David Padgett, and "NetWeasel" is either the same person or a fellow troll. There's apparently another member of the merry band called Ruben Logsdon, who works through anonymous remailers, and could be NetWeasel (despite the identical mailing style).

Please be sure to refer to ...@Murdervann.net by his proper name should you ever be bored enough to respond to one of his posts.

This troll-team works elsewhere; they've been active in alt.support.depression, and have been active enough (and scsn.net lax enough) to spearhead a serious effort to earn scsn.net the Usenet Death Penalty (on news.admin.net-abuse.misc).

I'm sure our readers in South Carolina are looking through phone books and public records right now to search and destroy the worthless carcass of David Padgett, and to pour two litres of well-matured urine through the letterbox of South Carolina SuperNet for having no discernible Acceptable Usage Policy. All I can say is: Don't do anything illegal. Nasty, nasty. Worthless festering pieces of shit have rights too, you know.

(heh.)

--

Rev Dr David Gerard Melbourne, Australia https://suburbia.net/fun

GothCode 2.0: GoAu!3CS+ TJt(ZZ) B10/23Bk^1 cR(DBR){G} p++ PPe(LNa) V++s M+3p1w ZEx(!!--Go) C+3p1u a29- n!O b+:- H194 g+! m+)++( w+T r-4E D+! h++TFe(Ad) s7 k+ Rn SrNy N0488Wn LauVIC+ HsMp1 We are much more beautiful than you.

More sneed:

p....@ a.com (Petro) wrote:

I've been to South Carolina a couple of times, and I noticed that most natives had their eyes placed really close together. Tell me, does your family tree resemble a 2x4?

Lurch (l....@ mg.com) wrote:

I am not sure whether or not the above statement was addressed to me, but if it were, I will have you know I take GREAT offence. My family tree is a great sequoia redwood tree, stretching forever into the horizon, filling the whole earth with its splendor, its roots reaching to the depths of the great Abyss itself and its topmost branches (which are prehensile) holding aloft clipping shears with which to trim the beard of GOD HIMSELF, who pisses on your ancestors, his urine stream cleverly missing every branch of my family tree. Amen.

-Daedalus Damocletian QPM, Firstborn Son of Jesus and your mamma's new boyfriend. Now YOUR family tree is a part of MY family tree.

Sure we'll put you in the slave section of the family till your momma gets used up, and then sell you as fertilizer, but at least you can say that while you lived you were a Damocletian, which is more than most.

P.S. Insult my ancestry again at your peril, pig-dog!

@Soren's dad also makes an appearance:

!schizomaxxxers @grizzly @Snakes @S discuss