Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

It's kind of like Charles Manson looking at someone and saying "Whoa, that dude is crazy!"It's not about accepting his support but more-so agreeing in how extreme you must be for Manson to think you're nuts. (195)

That's just the point. Don't you think if insane Manson thinks something is crazy, it might be normal? (-25)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

It's kind of like Charles Manson looking at someone and saying "Whoa, that dude is crazy!"It's not about accepting his support but more-so agreeing in how extreme you must be for Manson to think you're nuts. (195)

But in your scenario, Charles Manson were losing his party power to the "Let's not slaughter Sharron Tate and her friends' wing. Dem's welcoming Cheney is the most surprising thing I have ever seen in US politics. RFK jr for Trump is way up there. (-3)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

There will be time to argue about marginal tax rates and the proper size of government when we've confirmed that the fundamental structures (i.e. free and fair elections honored by both sides, respect for the process of orderly government, treating people with kindness and respect...even those you disagree with) are still in place. (39)

So are you voting left or right? (-7)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

That's just the point. Don't you think if insane Manson thinks something is crazy, it might be normal? (-25)

Obviously you are arguing in bad faith, but ... Just because an abuser thinks that murdering is bad, that doesn't mean that we have to either think murder is okay or that abusing is okay. We can still think that both are bad. You don't need to disagree with every single thing someone does to disagree with them most of the time. And you can make your own opinions by observation. Observe what Trump thinks and does. Anyone who thinks he is okay is very obviously an idiot, racist, helplessly cruel, so extremely ignorant that it turns into racism, or actively working to destroy the country. Or some mix. Even a complete moron can figure out that Trump is dangerous and crazy. (0)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Lets use it in a different way then:Lets say that for many years Chef 2 (no cilantro) and Chef 1 (some cilantro in all his dishes) have been working at the same restaurant. Cilantro lovers, ask for chef 1's dishes and cilantro haters ask for chef 2's dishes and both amass a big following due to how good their dishes are, of course some preferring chef 1 and other preferring chef 2. The cilantro haters cant fathom how Chef 1's fans can have his food if it has cilantro and vice versa but they respect each other because they both love the restaurant and everyone in the family/group can find something to eat. Then comes chef 3 who after decades of it just being 2 chefs its now 3, lets say he has little to no experience in being a chef but he has been a "successful business man and celebrity from a reality show" and the restaurant thinks it could be good for business . He starts cooking with just cilantro, he somehow convinces people that cilantro is a miracle cure and attacks chef 2 and... (1)

You and I both hate cilantro. We're trying to decide where to eat.I suggest a restaurant that we've both eaten at before. The food was delicious, and the chef doesn't use cilantro unless a customer specifically asks him to. The place isn't very fancy - it's not the type of place celebrities eat at, and the service isn't anything spectacular - but it's a good meal at an affordable price, and you always have a good experience when you go there. A while back, some people got sick after eating there and tried to blame the chef, but it turned out that they actually got sick from eating some tainted lo mein from the restaurant down the street.Before you get to make a suggestion, a van pulls up and two men grab you and throw you in the back. They beat you severely and take all your money before dumping you off in the parking lot of a trendy new restaurant called Cilantro's. You've heard about this place on the news - it replaced another restaurant that shut down after it was revealed that ... (0)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

So a thief and a male feminist came to your house and the thief started defending you against the male feminist. Are you gonna start attacking the thief and deal with the extreme danger of the male feminist first ( albeit it mean collaborating with the thief) or start attacking the thief with the male feminist ? (1)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/HHoaks

Score: 🐮🐮🐮🐮🐮(+0🐮)

Number of comments: 7

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!

autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion