Unable to load image

"A perfect storm": Extremism online and political polarization are increasing the risk of attacks, experts say - /r/news :soysnootypefast: :soysnooseethe: :soyreddit: :soyredditsmugcomputer: :soyjaktantrum: :soyjakferal: - "Just remove anonymity/usernames from all platforms. Users have to use their legal name. Let's get some real accountability behind people's actions and what they are spreading." :gigachad:

https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1hucb4v/a_perfect_storm_extremism_online_and_political/

								

								

However, even some normie ledditors start to :marseynooticeglow: about why living expenses are getting more and more expensive, yet the ruling class and media only talks about "internet extremism" as the issue that plebians should be focused about! :marseywrongthonk:

/u/88Dubs:

I'm gonna bash my fricking head against the...

IT'S BECAUSE WE'VE TRIED ASKING NICELY TO AFFORD BASIC SHIT AND KEEP GETTING * * FRICKING IGNORED!!!** By our political "leaders", by our employers, landlords, law enforcement (see; elite class public security detail, lower class suppression unit) we're fricking sick of fighting to meet even the bare minimum!!!

And now it's "Ooooohhhh.... I bet all these attacks are because of that EEEEVVVVIIIIILLL INTERNET! It's gotta be that 'political divisiveness. That's the proble-"

GET FRICKED, NBC! It's the thing that your fricking owners won't let you fricking talk about, and I am beyond sick of the actual fricking problem getting so carefully danced around.

We're. Tired. Of. The. Owner. Class's. Bull. Shit.

:#speechbubble: :!#speechbubble:

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/002/129/936/98e.gif https://i.rdrama.net/images/17212531966430192.webp

I never thought I would be agreeing with a redditor typing an neurodivergent mental breakdown :#bruh: :#@bwcpat::#heartbeat::#soysnootypefastpat:


/u/MoralClimber:

Its getting bad in the last couple of months we have had 2 assignation attempts on Trump a third non-attempt where a guy tried to sneak into his press conferences with a gun, we have had two shootings at Christian schools, an attack in new Orleans that killed a bunch of people and finally a guy tried to blowup a cybertruck in front of trump tower. these attacks are all over the place but the one connecting thread is it is all far right violence.

:#marseynoooticer: !chuds !nooticers


/u/ggxarmy:

Just remove anonymity/usernames from all platforms. Users have to use their legal name. Let's get some real accountability behind people's actions and what they are spreading.

:!#speechbubble:

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/900/238/4e2.jpg !soyteens !fedposters

94
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Change "not" to "barely" and it's correct.

You should keep yourself safe btw. :marseyropeyourself:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Even if you doctor your claim that way, you're still wrong.

That's because, dumbass, an 8-9% gain in real wages since the 70s is one of the largest gains in wealth that the world has ever seen. It's more absolute wealth gain than happened ever over all years prior to 1700. !neolibs

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1736141144FsGRT9wmsbbECQ.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lol, they have remarkably accurate stats on the 200 AD economy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is that a dig? We know a lot about how people lived just after the peak of the Roman Empire. We don't even need to piece it together forensically because there are lots of records.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Most of the world wasn't Rome. I just think it's funny that they're rounding down to zero for 1400 years.

I'm deeply suspicious of any graphs that look this smooth.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Rome was the rich part, though. Wealth really does round down to nearly zero for most of history compared to modern life. Subsistence farming has been the rule of human existence, not the exception.

I'll ask a different way, though: how would you characterize an 8-9% increase in wealth from the 70s versus historical gains? The commies here are claiming that such an increase represents "barely keeping up," but none of you pinkos has offered any alternative historical baseline, just skepticism of the one I shared (and not even detailed skepticism about methods, just "I don't believe it").

The only thing the commies have really offered here is envy economics: resentment that productivity gains aren't more redistributed. The problem with this argument, as !neolibs would put it, is that an economy that's as productive as today's but much more equal doesn't have evidence of being possible. There are rich societies with billionaires, and there are poor societies with none.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

IT HAS TO BE HIGHER!@! MORREEEEEE!!!!

:marseyraging:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1736141771UQmCl8PVS9bJyA.webp

Keep pinging your support group, cute twink.

And don't forget to lick those boots. :marseybootlicker2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh look, another chart showing real wages have long-term gains.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Keep simping for billionaires, I'm sure those gains will trickle down eventually.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

LOL, my entire point is that they already have and continue to, even to people like you. :marseyembrace:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseylaugh:

Cuck.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.