- "Just remove anonymity/usernames from all platforms. Users have to use their legal name. Let's get some real accountability behind people's actions and what they are spreading." 
However, even some normie ledditors start to 
about why living expenses are getting more and more expensive, yet the ruling class and media only talks about "internet extremism" as the issue that plebians should be focused about! 
I'm gonna bash my fricking head against the...
IT'S BECAUSE WE'VE TRIED ASKING NICELY TO AFFORD BASIC SHIT AND KEEP GETTING * * FRICKING IGNORED!!!** By our political "leaders", by our employers, landlords, law enforcement (see; elite class public security detail, lower class suppression unit) we're fricking sick of fighting to meet even the bare minimum!!!
And now it's "Ooooohhhh.... I bet all these attacks are because of that EEEEVVVVIIIIILLL INTERNET! It's gotta be that 'political divisiveness. That's the proble-"
GET FRICKED, NBC! It's the thing that your fricking owners won't let you fricking talk about, and I am beyond sick of the actual fricking problem getting so carefully danced around.
We're. Tired. Of. The. Owner. Class's. Bull. Shit.
I never thought I would be agreeing with a redditor typing an neurodivergent mental breakdown 
Its getting bad in the last couple of months we have had 2 assignation attempts on Trump a third non-attempt where a guy tried to sneak into his press conferences with a gun, we have had two shootings at Christian schools, an attack in new Orleans that killed a bunch of people and finally a guy tried to blowup a cybertruck in front of trump tower. these attacks are all over the place but the one connecting thread is it is all far right violence.
Just remove anonymity/usernames from all platforms. Users have to use their legal name. Let's get some real accountability behind people's actions and what they are spreading.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Rome was the rich part, though. Wealth really does round down to nearly zero for most of history compared to modern life. Subsistence farming has been the rule of human existence, not the exception.
I'll ask a different way, though: how would you characterize an 8-9% increase in wealth from the 70s versus historical gains? The commies here are claiming that such an increase represents "barely keeping up," but none of you pinkos has offered any alternative historical baseline, just skepticism of the one I shared (and not even detailed skepticism about methods, just "I don't believe it").
The only thing the commies have really offered here is envy economics: resentment that productivity gains aren't more redistributed. The problem with this argument, as !neolibs would put it, is that an economy that's as productive as today's but much more equal doesn't have evidence of being possible. There are rich societies with billionaires, and there are poor societies with none.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
IT HAS TO BE HIGHER!@! MORREEEEEE!!!!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context