https://old.reddit.com/r/sanfrancisco/comments/1i8k7gj/reports_of_ice_officers_on_the_29_bus_questioned/
100 comments in about an hour. Lot of people literally shaking.
MUNI operators are on the lookout for ICE agents
It's time to get our DOX ON
skankhunt coming in with some quality commentary. I have an episode to rewatch
AHHHHAHAHAHAHA I never thought I'd see a comment like this but here comes "tech/white lives matter" in a thread about our poor Honduran drug dealers
Anyway I'm pretty stoked how housing is going to get cheaper/available and construction labor is going up let's fricking gooooooooo
I better see KTVU filming ICE soon. If Boston is getting some LEO love I demand it NOW!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
does cali have an emergency response fund?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sure it does, but not for what you think.
And none of them from carbon taxes, which was the original argument you made.
Anyway I'm winding down can you at least just pick one thread and stick with it?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
none, 0 dollars from cap trade are in the california disaster budget?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Is this the thread you're sticking with?
And I'd check but their own link 404s so who the frick knows where the money went
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/auction-proceeds/auctionproceeds.htm
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
this is legit r-slurred, here let's settle this.
do taxes on emissions reduce emissions?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Bro this was your argument you started.
If you tax anyone doing anything people will stop doing said thing. Tax soda people buy less soda. So of course if you tax emissions people are going to try to emit less so they have money to buy food or pay bills.
This doesn't stop rich people tho as they literally output more emissions by 2500x per day than a middle class person does per year.
So ultimately, no it doesn't reduce aggregate CO2 emissions.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10640-022-00679-w
Trying to "fight climate change" by suppressing CO2 emissions is a red herring anyway. Carbon is not a pollutant. You literally need it to build flora and fauna. The earth was much warmer before we burned coal around the world.
There are ten rivers in Africa and Asia where runoff is directly polluting our oceans with plastics and toxic man made chemicals... but lets tax your average first worlder for driving his car, that'll save the world
Tell me, if you're so concerned about climate change, why don't we do anything about countries that pollute worse than we do?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context