Most Scientifically Literate Senator explains how science can be wrong, so we should never question it when it's settled :sciencejak:

https://x.com/ianmSC/status/1885114774247399621

IDK what the context is


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187151446911044.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/1735584487Pd3ql1pai5_mfA.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17177781034384797.webp

62
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Anyone can stats.

Finding a systemic problem in someone correctly following the methodology, implementing positive and negative controls at different intervals, determining if someone selected the correct analytical equipment to gather and quantity samples, reviewing overall QAQC from a parent standard to a prepared concentrated solution -- these are somewhat specialized and very useful for looking at an experiment.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Were still talking about vaccines and shit, yeah?

Clinical trials are standardized to follow inflexible analyses for a reason, and its so that all the FDAcels and the chinese foreigners - who somehow ended up working there totally not due to nepotism and do not have specialized understanding of all areas of biological science - can evaluate them.

If your clinical trial requires specialized methodologies that only some 5head locked in an academic basement can understand, well you wouldn't even get your foot in the door, you are already dead in the water.

if you think otherwise you do not know what you're talking about.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Now playing: Simian Segue (DKC).mp3

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.