Where does it say explicitly that the way to eliminate these people is through congress.
`it literally says their appointments are fricking defined by law, which can be changed by congress. if the fricking congress wanted to make appointment subject to presidential removal they can do that.
If congress does not explicitly say who has the right of termination on the creation of the organization, it should be assumed that whoever is the head of the organization has the right to terminate because legally that is how every organization works. Trump is head, he can fire. The fact they don't explicitly outline this is the same reason they don't explicitly outline whether congress has the power to breathe.
`the government isn't a fricking corporate hierarchy subject to the fricking whims of some elected CEO, you absolute moron.
`it needs to orders of magnitude more stable because there isn't a fricking market of competitors sitting around waiting to take up the fricking slack when it fails...
that is how every organization works
`u fricking unamerican neoliberal-brained r-slur
`for another example in the fricking govt: the fricking supreme court is fricking explicitly appointed for life, and not subject to anything beyond criminal impeachment, regardless of who appoints them.
No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
No doxxing.
Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
If you post screenshots of publicly-available content, make sure to also include links.
Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
Absolutely NO misgendering.
Absolutely NO antisemitism.
Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
You are encouraged to egg people on to transition or otherwise make drastic life changes.
This site is a janny playground, participation implies enthusiastic consent to being janny abused by unstable alcoholic bullies who have nothing better to do than banning you for any reason or no reason whatsoever (MODS = GODS)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Where does it say explicitly that the way to eliminate these people is through congress. How do you pass a law to fire a person lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
`it literally says their appointments are fricking defined by law, which can be changed by congress. if the fricking congress wanted to make appointment subject to presidential removal they can do that.
`because u lack elementary education:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If congress does not explicitly say who has the right of termination on the creation of the organization, it should be assumed that whoever is the head of the organization has the right to terminate because legally that is how every organization works. Trump is head, he can fire. The fact they don't explicitly outline this is the same reason they don't explicitly outline whether congress has the power to breathe.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
`the government isn't a fricking corporate hierarchy subject to the fricking whims of some elected CEO, you absolute moron.
`it needs to orders of magnitude more stable because there isn't a fricking market of competitors sitting around waiting to take up the fricking slack when it fails...
`u fricking unamerican neoliberal-brained r-slur
`for another example in the fricking govt: the fricking supreme court is fricking explicitly appointed for life, and not subject to anything beyond criminal impeachment, regardless of who appoints them.
!commenters
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Most likely this goes to the supreme court who slaps Trump's fingers and tells him not to be such a bad boy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context