Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In what way?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do you think I genuinely believed that the word "weak" in that context meant the textin question was written by a bit of a wimp, or do you think maybe I was joking?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

no he just assumed it obvious that the weak for the strength of the certainty, not physical

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah, that's the joke, man.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:c:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sorry for not using a /s, sperglord

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.