Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Chill, snaps. It was InfoWars.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyglow:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No. I haven't even clicked the link to read the article.


Keep Yourself Safe

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyunabomber: but cringe :marseydisagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh neat, i see RealRaNews got a yuropoor spin-off!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

unironic Nazbol Tuckercels

/r/stupidpol schizos made a news site?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.