I suspect part of it is a fear of the following slippery slope:
admitting of genetic differences between breads -> genetic differences between races -> providing scientific proof that some races are better than others -> therefor some races should be treated better/worse than others.
I personally find this line of argument flawed.
What you describe goes against the narrative that any living thing in a species is just as X, Y, and Z as any other living thing in that species. It's part of the "equality of outcome" push
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm gonna be honest I don't trust this science either
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context