After several weeks of waiting they reject again my perfect article, second only to the Vitruvian man. The wikicel posted his typical copied 'n pasted response that provides zero (0) feedback.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
I am quoting fricking Reuters and The Independent what else do you want?
The Reviewer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Praxidicae
We can see that this king, PRAXIDICAEπ, stands with BLM; and this does not explains why he would have any sort of negative bias or prejudice against our platform, that stands against xenomisia and hate of any kind.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Did you list Bardfinn et al. as a source?
A PhD techno biologist Reddit mod with patents and multiple book deals is the most reliable source on the internet.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If you watch the history of the draft you can see that I used DrOaken as source back in April but she got rejected
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
π¨Bard bot alert!π¨
Reset the counter. Current counter was: 0 days, 0 hours, 20 minutes
Record is 0 days, 21 hours
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context