After several weeks of waiting they reject again my perfect article, second only to the Vitruvian man. The wikicel posted his typical copied 'n pasted response that provides zero (0) feedback.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
I am quoting fricking Reuters and The Independent what else do you want?
The Reviewer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Praxidicae
We can see that this king, PRAXIDICAE🌈, stands with BLM; and this does not explains why he would have any sort of negative bias or prejudice against our platform, that stands against xenomisia and hate of any kind.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedians_who_are_too_sarcastic_for_their_own_good_and_who_no_one_takes_seriously_or_takes_too_seriously
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Bardfinn's bio: "Tenured Freehold in bigots' heads since 2016."
Could this be?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
🚨Bard bot alert!🚨
Reset the counter. Current counter was: 0 days, 3 hours, 1 minutes
Record is 0 days, 21 hours
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Wikipedia are servants of the devil.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Did you list Bardfinn et al. as a source?
A PhD techno biologist Reddit mod with patents and multiple book deals is the most reliable source on the internet.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If you watch the history of the draft you can see that I used DrOaken as source back in April but she got rejected
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
🚨Bard bot alert!🚨
Reset the counter. Current counter was: 0 days, 0 hours, 20 minutes
Record is 0 days, 21 hours
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
https://encyclopediadramatica.online/Main_Page This is the rdrama wiki
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Why would you call us a reddit clone? Smh
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You should expand each of the paragraphs in the "Operations" section into a section in itself. TXBountyHunters alone should have enough public media citations to be well-sprinkled with references.
They want "trustworthy" sources, so the more snopes and MSM fact check articles you can link to, the better.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Because you put in Medium and KnowYourMeme as sources r-slur. They're user-generated, so unreliable. You have to read the novel-length rules
As for notability, you want sources talking about rdrama more than just giving credit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah the article is shit and rdrama isn't noteworthy enough for a wikipedia article.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The rdrama shooter arc might have qualified us if it was real
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We dont need that smoke
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
imagine seeking validation from a beggar website past its peak
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The reviewer is probably a jannie on this board and is trying to prevent us from going the way of /r/Drama, you should be thankful for their diligence tbqh
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Wikipedia is a cabal, you need to grease the right palms.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm continually surprised at how quick said little cabal will revert anything that doesn't go with their view of the world. Even if something is objectively false they'll fight relentlessly to keep their version. I don't understand how they can do it for free.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Just don’t go to any article without empirical evidence, like humanities, history, biology, etc. As of yet, math, chemistry, and physics are fine… for now.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yea I thought reddit jannies are bad. When wikipedia jannie drama gets posted here I can't even decipher it through all the autism
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Someone posted an argument once. The page was literally full of text arguing. I scrolled and closed the tab
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
He can't breathe
Drama can't Sneed
Really makes you think
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Speaking of which, Sneed really needs a Wikipedia article.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Dramaphobia.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Drama erasure
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Dramamisia is the new PC term.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Please forgive my ignorance. I promise to not only DO better, but also, BE better.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Donate 10% of your income this month to LGBT charity and your sins will be forgiven.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Does hiring trussy count?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Heh, okay.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Same people that think chrischan isn't notable enough, they're just dramamisic
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
(S)he probably is, but no one wants to janny it when cwcki exists.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
You need to reference more BLM and LGBTQ2AA+ verified sources chud.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Woke literally just means informed. You imply woke people are wrong. SO you're implying that to be right is to be wrong. Therefore you can be wrong, and therefore can make up whatever shit you want, because if i point out it's wrong, that means i'm right and therefore i'm wrong. It's a brilliant form of double think / cognitive dissonance that is extremely common in people with reactionary and conservative world views that unfortunately can lead to .... yes you got it, fascism.
Snapshots:
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
ghostarchive.org (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context