you should listen to debussy
https://www.scotusblog.com
Scotus opinion on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization will not be issued in about 3 hours.
Make predictions about the outcome and generally post preemptive sneed, your own or someone else's.
Check out scotus opinion here in the future whenever it's issued, probably in 2 weeks:
It didn't come out today
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It will be overturned. The US will fragment further. All of this benefits the Russian Federation.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Baby-killing is a bit of a weird hill to die on, but they're really going for it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Rent is due
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
it's not murder
it's eviction of a non-paying tenant from the womb
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
All squatters put the rent in the bucket or else they get the hose
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Shut up chud I want the thrill of murder
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You canβt βmurderβ rentoids. Theyβre living in your house with consent and as we all know consent can be withdrawn at any time. This makes them dangerous trespasses
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Every dead baby is one less car causing traffic in 16 years.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Russia can't even conquer a nation of wheat farmers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Very strange looking farm equipment.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh, what, you're gonna complain about us giving them our hand-me-downs now?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why would I complain. The Russian Federation is winning. NATO is losing. By the end of this year your economies will be in ruin, and Russia will be victorious on all fronts.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
United States of Russia
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If the majority of USAmurkins are happy to let people live, is it really going to divide the country? I mean, aside from riots on TV and in Blue Team cities?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
yeah how could taking away one little medical procedure that can determine the whole course of your life fragment the country
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That depends, does the one procedure affect more than 0.2% of the population?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's weird because the biggest pro-choice proponents and the most seethe from overturning RvW is in blue states that already have laws guaranteeing access to abortions. For most of the people complaining, they will never have to worry about being denied access to abortions.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Having talked to these people, they are simply angry that they are not able to impose their will on states they don't like, hence the HUMAN RIIIIGHTS talking point getting thrown around. They get extremely mad at the idea that states should be allowed to do what they want and want to empower the federal government to get that under control, and they can't imagine a world where this would work against their interests. "Why should we ALLOW oppression to occur?" You may think it's nice that things are compartmentalized so everyone has a chance to see the policies they want, but you will be met with the slam dunk that is "just move lol." Some of these tards are even delusional enough to think that pro-life is a tiny minority stance that doesn't actually represent the people in states like Texas, so it's actually representing the people for the feds to flex on them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's just so willfully blind. I would bet that almost all of these people are in full support of states legalizing weed on their own, despite it still being literally illegal at the federal level, but then they flip and put on their full federalist mask when it comes to abortion access.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh yeah, don't get me started. Most of them just want to use whatever means they can to get their way and any invocations they have of the sanctity of the system (e.g. jan6) is just a hollow appeal to an ethos they have contempt for
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
it just means we're gonna get more non aborted southerners
let that sink in
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
That's exactly why I support banning abortion, I think women should have the right to choose but I want American women to have their rights taken away so they can contribute to the destabilisation of the country.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Soviet citizens used to use abortion as a form of birth control because condoms were hard to come by.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context