Unable to load image

It doesn't matter if the information in our encyclopedia is actually true or not, chud :chudsey:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kiwi_Farms#Suicide_of_harassment_victims

The consensus says it's true, and the purpose of Wikipedia is to maintain the consensus. It doesn't matter whether it's factually true or false.

also some additional drama that may not yet have been posted, see hector martin coping on the matter:

https://nitter.net/marcan42/status/1538161455081861122?cursor=LBkWgIDQ1cbs0tgqJQQRAAA%3D#r

17
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think you've answered your own question. Using the US Bureau's database is original research. It would not be original research if they said "We are aware of a claim that a US citizen died by suicide under X circumstances. This is false." But I don't see why the US Bureau would have a complete list of all citizens who died by suicide, nor how you know where Near supposedly died by suicide (which is not necessarily anywhere close to where they lived) etc. All of these factors are something you could possibly convince me of, but the fact that it is not immediately and uncontroversially clear to an independent observer reading the reliable source with no further context makes it original research and unverifiable.

Wikipedia is astounding. If you post circumstancial yet valid evidence that contradicts [their favored] hearsay evidence, then it's original research, thus unverifiable and cannot be posted. You literally can't 1 + 1 = 2 post there.

But I don't see why the US Bureau would have a complete list of all citizens who died by suicide

???? "Although the "US Bureau [of something]" cannot account for 100% of all suicides, their 2022 section does not include Byuu's alleged suicide." All sources must have a 100% accuracy rating--just in this case--because :marseygigaretard: :marseygigaretard: :marseygigaretard: .

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i thought the text picked out in this post was hyperbole or otherwise hamming up what they actually said but no thats literally exactly what it says on the page im floored

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ok, so can we manufacture a consensus that lead paint is delicious and healthy?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The cope and seethe about Near has been excellent


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17092367509484937.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17093267613293715.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17151063782028813.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm surprised that guy, whoever he is, managed to keep his identity secret in this day and age

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the secret is autism

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

George "The Landlord" Floyd aka "Big Floyd" was the star of a masterpiece cinema verite documenting his escapades in accepting kitty for rent. While /r/loveforlandlords is prohibited from endorsing this methodology by the terms of the sitewide agreement, the landphobic admins do at least allow us to celebrate his life and memorialize his death at the hands of a bigoted white nationalist rentoid Minneapolis Police offer. Rest in property, king.

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.