Reported by:
- Wegkerflurgler : Threatening violence
- Certifiedcarpussyoperator : The user above does butt to mouth
- Goomble : I do butt to mouth
- Pog : This user ordered the code red
- Tardish : The original antifa
- Brasillguana : I'm sorry sur but we only have Code Red available as an enema
- ACA : rdrama reports are super comments, it's a great way to get the top comment in a big thread
- skankhunt42 : tfw reportmaxxing time
- HarryTrumanDorisDay : ACA's report is r-slurred because you don't get dramacoin for this, reports are literally jannying
- EinsatzGRUEppen : WE DO IT FOR FREE
Saving Private Marsey.
- 40
- 227
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
Snapshots:
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
ghostarchive.org (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context