Sneerclubbers sass and sealion seethingly

>Oh frick off, if you start off with outraged dudgeon don’t come back snarking at me because I let the argument go on at the level of tone you set. You kicked this off breathing into a paper bag between sentences to calm down, and if I stick out my tongue I can taste the spittle on my face through the screen from this latest one. I can see why though: parsing all that for an actual point I can descry that otherwise you’d have been hard-pressed to fill more than a couple of very short paragraphs.

>Let me settle this then: I moderate /r/SneerClub, I’ve been around /r/SneerClub longer than I’ve been a mod, which is a while, and I’m well aware of everything and more that you’re aware of that’s deeply wrong with Siskind, including his insidious use of cooked up stats, arguments, and “woah is me” ingenue to promote things that are wrong and which, at heart, he may even know like we do are really very bad. I posted this on /r/SneerClub, with that title, in the full knowledge that everybody here but you would see that that is the context for how I voiced my brief assessment - my tone - and therefore in the full confidence that I was not getting caught up in any insidious mindgames he might like to play with language on his usual gullible, self-gullible, or just straight evil marks, johns, patsies, whatever. Hence the phrase “good-by-the-standards”, the standards being buried as deep as or deeper than the deepest Oceanic trench on Earth, a ”hence” which is obvious to everybody here but you.